Literature DB >> 20623333

MIB1/Ki-67 labelling index can classify grade 2 breast cancer into two clinically distinct subgroups.

Mohammed A Aleskandarany1, Emad A Rakha, R Douglas Macmillan, Desmond G Powe, Ian O Ellis, Andrew R Green.   

Abstract

Histological grade is recognized as one of the strongest prognostic factors in operable breast cancer (BC). Although grade 1 and grade 3 tumours are biologically and clinically distinct, grade 2 tumours bear considerable difficulty in outcome prediction and planning therapies. Several attempts such as genomic grade index have been performed to subclassify grade 2 into two subgroups with clinical relevance. Here, we present evidence that the routinely evaluable immunohistochemical MIB1/Ki67 labelling index (MIB-LI) can classify grade 2 tumours into two clinically distinct subgroups. In this study, growth fractions of 1,550 primary operable invasive breast carcinomas were immunohistochemically assayed on full-face tissue sections using the MIB1 clone of Ki-67. Growth fractions were assessed as number of MIB1 positive nuclei in 1,000 tumour nuclei at high-power magnification and expressed as MIB1-LI. Using a 10% cut-point of MIB1-LI, grade 2 BCs were classified into low (49.8%) and high (50.2%) proliferative subgroups. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis revealed statistically significant differences between these subgroups regarding patients' BC specific survival (P < 0.001), and metastasis free survival (P < 0.001) which was independent of the well-established prognostic factors (HR = 2.944, 95% CI = 1.634-5.303, P < 0.001). In conclusion, our results further demonstrate that grade 2 BCs may represent at least two biological or behaviourally different entities. Assay of growth fraction in BC using MIB1/Ki67 immunohistochemistry is a robust cost-effective diagnostic tool that subdivides grade 2 tumours into low and high risk populations providing additional prognostic information in planning therapies and outcome prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20623333     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1028-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  31 in total

1.  Immunohistochemistry profiles of breast ductal carcinoma: factor analysis of digital image analysis data.

Authors:  Arvydas Laurinavicius; Aida Laurinaviciene; Valerijus Ostapenko; Darius Dasevicius; Sonata Jarmalaite; Juozas Lazutka
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.644

2.  MCM2: An alternative to Ki-67 for measuring breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Einas M Yousef; Daniela Furrer; David L Laperriere; Muhammad R Tahir; Sylvie Mader; Caroline Diorio; Louis A Gaboury
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Double staining cytologic samples with quantitative Feulgen-thionin and anti-Ki-67 immunocytochemistry as a method of distinguishing cells with abnormal DNA content from normal cycling cells.

Authors:  Gerald Li; Martial Guillaud; Michele Follen; Calum MacAulay
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol       Date:  2012-10

Review 4.  [Assessment of proliferation: core biopsy or resection specimen? Discrepancies in breast cancer with low and high proliferation].

Authors:  E C Obermann; S Eppenberger-Castori; C Tapia
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Aurora kinase A outperforms Ki67 as a prognostic marker in ER-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  H R Ali; S-J Dawson; F M Blows; E Provenzano; P D Pharoah; C Caldas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Ki-67: level of evidence and methodological considerations for its role in the clinical management of breast cancer: analytical and critical review.

Authors:  Elisabeth Luporsi; Fabrice André; Frédérique Spyratos; Pierre-Marie Martin; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Laurent Arnould; Anne Gompel; Caroline Egele; Bruno Poulet; Krishna B Clough; Hubert Crouet; Alain Fourquet; Jean-Pierre Lefranc; Carole Mathelin; Nicolas Rouyer; Daniel Serin; Marc Spielmann; Margaret Haugh; Marie-Pierre Chenard; Etienne Brain; Patricia de Cremoux; Jean-Pierre Bellocq
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Peritumoral vascular invasion and NHERF1 expression define an immunophenotype of grade 2 invasive breast cancer associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Andrea Malfettone; Concetta Saponaro; Angelo Paradiso; Giovanni Simone; Annita Mangia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The combination of Ki67, histological grade and estrogen receptor status identifies a low-risk group among 1,854 chemo-naïve women with N0/N1 primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Carina Strand; Martin Bak; Signe Borgquist; Gunilla Chebil; Anna-Karin Falck; Marie-Louise Fjällskog; Dorthe Grabau; Ingrid Hedenfalk; Karin Jirström; Marie Klintman; Per Malmström; Hans Olsson; Lisa Rydén; Olle Stål; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Mårten Fernö
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-14

9.  Triple-negative breast cancer is associated with EGFR, CK5/6 and c-KIT expression in Malaysian women.

Authors:  Shant Kishen Kanapathy Pillai; Annie Tay; Suseela Nair; Chee-Onn Leong
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-09-26

10.  Biology of primary breast cancer in older women treated by surgery: with correlation with long-term clinical outcome and comparison with their younger counterparts.

Authors:  B M Syed; A R Green; E C Paish; D Soria; J Garibaldi; L Morgan; D A L Morgan; I O Ellis; K L Cheung
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.