Literature DB >> 20622937

Statistical Hypothesis Testing for Postreconstructed and Postregistered Medical Images.

Eugene Demidenko1.   

Abstract

Postreconstructed and postregistered medical images are typically treated as the raw data, implicitly assuming that those operations are error free. We question this assumption and explore how the precision of reconstruction and affine registration can be assessed by the image covariance matrix and confidence interval, called the confidence eigenimage, using a statistical model-based approach. Various hypotheses may be tested after image reconstruction and registration using classical statistical hypothesis testing vehicles: Is there a statistically significant difference between images? Does the intensity at a specific location or area of interest belong to the "normal" range? Is there a tumor? Does the image require rigid registration? We illustrate statistical hypothesis testing with three examples: breast computed tomography, breast near infrared linear reconstruction, and brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20622937      PMCID: PMC2900857          DOI: 10.1137/080722199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SIAM J Imaging Sci        ISSN: 1936-4954            Impact factor:   2.867


  15 in total

Review 1.  Confidence maps and confidence intervals for near infrared images in breast cancer.

Authors:  T D Tosteson; B W Pogue; E Demidenko; T O McBride; K D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  A survey of medical image registration.

Authors:  J B Maintz; M A Viergever
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Consistent image registration.

Authors:  G E Christensen; H J Johnson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko; Alex Hartov; Keith Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Review of complex breast cysts: implications for cancer detection and clinical practice.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Les Irwig; Owen Ung
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 6.  Digital mammography.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory.

Authors:  Keith J Worsley; Jonathan E Taylor; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Jason Lerch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers.

Authors:  Judy C Dean; Christina C Ilvento
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Optimization of MRI protocols and pulse sequence parameters for eigenimage filtering.

Authors:  H Soltanian-Zadeh; R Saigal; J P Windham; A E Yagle; D O Hearshen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy.

Authors:  G E Christensen; S C Joshi; M I Miller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.