Literature DB >> 20622655

Late morbidity after colon interposition for corrosive esophageal injury: risk factors, management, and outcome. A 20-years experience.

Mircea Chirica1, Nicolas Veyrie, Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand, Sarah Zohar, Bruno Halimi, Michel Celerier, Pierre Cattan, Emile Sarfati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report our experience in the management of late morbidity after colonic interposition for caustic injury and to assess the influence of coloplasty dysfunction on patient outcome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Reports on coloplasty dysfunction after colon interposition for corrosive esophageal injuries are scarce in the literature. Dysfunction of the colonic substitute might jeopardize an already fragile functional result, and appropriate management can improve outcome.
METHODS: Long-term follow-up (>6 months) was conducted in 223 patients (125 men; median age, 35 years) who underwent colonic interposition for caustic injuries between 1987 and 2006. Statistical tests were performed on this cohort to identify risk factors for late morbidity and functional outcome. During the same period, 28 patients who underwent colon interposition for caustic injury in another center were referred for treatment of coloplasty dysfunction. Data from these patients were used together with those of our patients to describe specific coloplasty-related complications and their management.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5 years (range: 6 months-20 years), late complications were recorded in 125 (55%) of our patients (stenosis 36%, reflux 11%, redundancy 5%). A delay in reconstruction <6 months (P = 0.03) and absence of thoracic inlet enlargement (P = 0.002) were independent predictive factors for cervical anastomotic stenosis. Functional failure was recorded in 52 patients (23%) and was associated with a delay in reconstruction <6 months (P = 0.009) and emergency tracheotomy (P = 0.002). Coloplasty dysfunction was responsible for half of the recorded failures. Revision surgery for coloplasty dysfunction was performed in 96 patients (68 local, 28 referred) with an overall 70% success rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Late complications occurred in half of the patients after colonic interposition for corrosive injuries and accounted for half of the functional failures. Prolonged surgical follow-up and appropriate management of coloplasty dysfunction are key factors for long-term success after esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20622655     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e8fd40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Computed tomography evaluation of high-grade esophageal necrosis after corrosive ingestion to avoid unnecessary esophagectomy.

Authors:  Mircea Chirica; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Benjamin Pariente; Fabienne Fieux; François Sabatier; Franck Loiseaux; Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Jean Marc Gornet; Marie-Dominique Brette; Emile Sarfati; Elie Azoulay; Anne Marie Zagdanski; Pierre Cattan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Caustic injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sandro Contini; Carmelo Scarpignato
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The Damage Pattern to the Gastrointestinal Tract Depends on the Nature of the Ingested Caustic Agent.

Authors:  Romain Ducoudray; Antoine Mariani; Helene Corte; Aurore Kraemer; Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Emile Sarfati; Pierre Cattan; Mircea Chirica
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Adenocarcinoma on colon interposition for corrosive esophageal injury: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Hadrien Tranchart; Mircea Chirica; Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Emile Sarfati; Pierre Cattan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-12

5.  Ileo-right hemi-colonic cervical pull-up on a non-supercharged ileocolic arterial pedicle: A technical and case report.

Authors:  Andreas Rr Weiss; Christina Hackl; Yorick Soeder; Hans J Schlitt; Marc-H Dahlke
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Transhiatal jejunal interposition preserving the whole stomach and vagal trunk for a benign esophageal stricture in a male adolescent: report of a case.

Authors:  Satoru Motoyama; Reijiro Saito; Mayako Morii; Hiroaki Yoshino; Tatsuzo Hebiguchi; Jun-ichi Ogawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Caustic injuries of the upper digestive tract: a population observational study.

Authors:  Carmen Cabral; Mircéa Chirica; Cécile de Chaisemartin; Jean-Marc Gornet; Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Bruno Halimi; Pierre Cattan; Emile Sarfati
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  In vitro development and characterization of a tissue-engineered conduit resembling esophageal wall using human and pig skeletal myoblast, oral epithelial cells, and biologic scaffolds.

Authors:  Tigran Poghosyan; Sebastien Gaujoux; Valerie Vanneaux; Patrick Bruneval; Thomas Domet; Severine Lecourt; Mohamed Jarraya; Rony Sfeir; Jerome Larghero; Pierre Cattan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Benign esophageal stricture after thermal injury treated with esophagectomy and ileocolon interposition.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kitajima; Kota Momose; Seigi Lee; Shusuke Haruta; Hisashi Shinohara; Masaki Ueno; Takeshi Fujii; Harushi Udagawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Colon interposition graft for corrosive esophageal stricture: midterm functional outcome.

Authors:  Ndubueze Ezemba; John C Eze; Ikechukwu A Nwafor; Kenneth C Etukokwu; Obinna I Orakwe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.