Literature DB >> 20622224

Evaluation of three automated human immunoturbidimetric assays for the detection of C-reactive protein in dogs.

Stefanie Klenner1, Natali Bauer, Andreas Moritz.   

Abstract

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a major, acute-phase protein in dogs; however, there is a need for automated assays to ensure in-time patient monitoring. Three automated immunoturbidimetric assays (Randox, Thermo, and Wako) developed for human beings were evaluated for their ability to detect canine CRP, including method validation, evaluation of diagnostic use, and establishment of exploratory reference intervals. Sera from 36 healthy dogs and 82 diseased dogs were included for method comparison with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Tridelta) serving as the reference method. A nonparametric estimate of the 1-sided 95% reference interval was established (n = 36). Precision study revealed good intra-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) of 1-10%, 0-9%, and 2-13% for the Randox, Thermo, and Wako assays, respectively. Interassay CVs were 18%, 24%, and 19% respectively. Because of a low linear range, the Thermo test was considered unsuitable for use with canine specimens. No significant differences were present between the results obtained with the Randox and Wako assays with CRP concentrations less than 15 mg/l; however, median CRP results differed significantly between the Thermo test and the ELISA (P = 0.03). Bland-Altman analysis detected a proportional bias of 0.28, -0.59, and 0.61 mg/l for the Randox, Thermo, and Wako assays, respectively. For all tests, median CRP values were significantly different between healthy dogs and dogs with neoplasia. The upper limit of the reference intervals were 8.2 and 9.9 mg/l for the Randox and Wako assays, respectively. In contrast to the Thermo test, the Randox and Wako assays were suitable for detection of abnormally high canine CRP concentrations; however, improvement of assay precision and evaluation of accuracy are warranted before their clinical use with canine specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20622224     DOI: 10.1177/104063871002200408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein as diagnostic markers of systemic inflammation in dogs.

Authors:  Michelle B Christensen; Rebecca Langhorn; Amelia Goddard; Eva B Andreasen; Elena Moldal; Asta Tvarijonaviciute; Jolle Kirpensteijn; Sabrina Jakobsen; Frida Persson; Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Evaluation of the Randox and Fuji Dri-Chem vcCRP-P assays of canine C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Sung-Ah An; Ye-In Oh; Ul-Soo Choi; Jong-Bok Lee; Kyoung-Won Seo
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.569

3.  Evaluation of an automated immunoturbidimetric assay for detecting canine C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Michele Berlanda; Carlotta Valente; Federico Bonsembiante; Tamara Badon; Silvia Bedin; Barbara Contiero; Carlo Guglielmini; Helen Poser
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Analytical validation of a point-of-care test and an automated immunoturbidimetric assay for the measurement of canine C-reactive protein in serum.

Authors:  Marshal A Covin; Robynne R Gomez; Jan S Suchodolski; Jörg M Steiner; Jonathan A Lidbury
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Decreased plasma Chromogranin A361-372 (Catestatin) but not Chromogranin A17-38 (Vasostatin) in female dogs with bacterial uterine infection (pyometra).

Authors:  Supranee Jitpean; Mats Stridsberg; Ann Pettersson; Odd V Höglund; Bodil Ström Holst; Ragnvi Hagman
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Validation of a commercially available automated canine-specific immunoturbidimetric method for measuring canine C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Anna Hillström; Ragnvi Hagman; Harold Tvedten; Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen
Journal:  Vet Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 1.180

Review 7.  C-reactive protein: quantitative marker of surgical trauma and post-surgical complications in dogs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michelle B Christensen; Thomas Eriksen; Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Evaluation of a species-specific C-reactive protein assay for the dog on the ABX Pentra 400 clinical chemistry analyzer.

Authors:  Sarah Hindenberg; Stefanie Klenner-Gastreich; Nicole Kneier; Sabine Zielinsky; Kris Gommeren; Natali Bauer; Andreas Moritz
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Use of heterologous immunoassays for quantification of serum proteins: The case of canine C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Alberto Muñoz-Prieto; Asta Tvarijonaviciute; Damián Escribano; Silvia Martínez-Subiela; José J Cerón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of a novel quantitative canine species-specific point-of-care assay for C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Sarah Hindenberg; Melanie Keßler; Sabine Zielinsky; Judith Langenstein; Andreas Moritz; Natali Bauer
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.