Amy Silder1, Darryl G Thelen, Bryan C Heiderscheit. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1300 University Ave., Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown evidence of residual scar tissue at the musculotendon junction following a hamstring strain injury, which could influence re-injury risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether bilateral differences in strength, neuromuscular patterns, and musculotendon kinematics during sprinting are present in individuals with a history of unilateral hamstring injury, and whether such differences are linked to the presence of scar tissue. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with a previous hamstring injury (>5 months prior) participated in a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging exam, isokinetic strength testing, and a biomechanical assessment of treadmill sprinting. Bilateral comparisons were made for peak knee flexion torque, angle of peak torque, and the hamstrings:quadriceps strength ratio, as well as muscle activations and peak hamstring stretch during sprinting. MR images were used to measure the volumes of the proximal tendon/aponeurosis of the biceps femoris, with asymmetries considered indicative of scar tissue. FINDINGS: A significantly enlarged proximal biceps femoris tendon volume was measured on the side of prior injury. However, no significant differences between the previously injured and uninjured limbs were found in strength measures, peak hamstring stretch, or muscle activation patterns. Further, the degree of asymmetry in tendon volume was not correlated to any of the functional measures. INTERPRETATION: Injury-induced changes in morphology do not seem discernable from strength measures, running kinematics, or muscle activation patterns. Further research is warranted to ascertain whether residual scarring alters localized musculotendon mechanics in a way that may contribute to the high rates of muscle re-injury that are observed clinically. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown evidence of residual scar tissue at the musculotendon junction following a hamstring strain injury, which could influence re-injury risk. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether bilateral differences in strength, neuromuscular patterns, and musculotendon kinematics during sprinting are present in individuals with a history of unilateral hamstring injury, and whether such differences are linked to the presence of scar tissue. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with a previous hamstring injury (>5 months prior) participated in a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging exam, isokinetic strength testing, and a biomechanical assessment of treadmill sprinting. Bilateral comparisons were made for peak knee flexion torque, angle of peak torque, and the hamstrings:quadriceps strength ratio, as well as muscle activations and peak hamstring stretch during sprinting. MR images were used to measure the volumes of the proximal tendon/aponeurosis of the biceps femoris, with asymmetries considered indicative of scar tissue. FINDINGS: A significantly enlarged proximal biceps femoris tendon volume was measured on the side of prior injury. However, no significant differences between the previously injured and uninjured limbs were found in strength measures, peak hamstring stretch, or muscle activation patterns. Further, the degree of asymmetry in tendon volume was not correlated to any of the functional measures. INTERPRETATION: Injury-induced changes in morphology do not seem discernable from strength measures, running kinematics, or muscle activation patterns. Further research is warranted to ascertain whether residual scarring alters localized musculotendon mechanics in a way that may contribute to the high rates of muscle re-injury that are observed clinically. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Arni Arnason; Stefan B Sigurdsson; Arni Gudmundsson; Ingar Holme; Lars Engebretsen; Roald Bahr Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Charles A McKenzie; Angel R Pineda; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Anja C Brau; Brian A Hargreaves; Garry E Gold; Jean H Brittain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Anthony G Schache; Tim W Dorn; Tim V Wrigley; Nicholas A T Brown; Marcus G Pandy Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2013-09-08 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Jennifer L Sanfilippo; Amy Silder; Marc A Sherry; Michael J Tuite; Bryan C Heiderscheit Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Xavier Valle; Johannes L Tol; Bruce Hamilton; Gil Rodas; Peter Malliaras; Nikos Malliaropoulos; Vicenc Rizo; Marcel Moreno; Jaume Jardi Journal: Asian J Sports Med Date: 2015-12-01
Authors: Joseph J Knapik; Bria Graham; Jacketta Cobbs; Diane Thompson; Ryan Steelman; Bruce H Jones Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Joseph J Knapik; Bria Graham; Jacketta Cobbs; Diane Thompson; Ryan Steelman; Bruce H Jones Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 2.362