Literature DB >> 20619968

Reliability, validity and clinical utility of three types of pain behavioural observation scales for young children with burns aged 0-5 years.

Alette de Jong1, Martin Baartmans, Marco Bremer, Rob van Komen, Esther Middelkoop, Wim Tuinebreijer, Nancy van Loey.   

Abstract

Pain measurement is a prerequisite for individualized pain management and research into pain interventions. There is a need for reliable and valid pain measures for young children with burns. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the pain observation scale for young children (POCIS), the COMFORT behaviour scale (COMFORT-B) and the nurse observational visual analogue scale (VAS obs) are reliable, valid and clinically useful instruments to measure pain in children with burns aged 0-5years. Participating trained nurses (N=102) rated pain of 154 children during hospitalization. Two trained nurses simultaneously assessed pain at fixed intervals by using the previous mentioned measures. Cronbach's alpha for POCIS was .87 for background and .89 for procedural pain. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were .75 for background and .81 for procedural pain. COMFORT-B observations yielded Cronbach's alpha of .77 for background and .86 for procedural pain and ICCs of .83 for background and .82 for procedural pain. The VAS obs resulted in ICCs of .55 for background and .60 for procedural pain. Correlation coefficient between POCIS and COMFORT-B was .79 (p<.01), Standardized response mean was 1.04 for both POCIS and COMFORT-B. Background pain measured with POCIS and COMFORT-B was lower than procedural pain (p<.001). Nurses found POCIS easier and quicker to use, but COMFORT-B was found to indicate pain more accurately. Both POCIS and COMFORT-B are reliable, valid and practical scales for pain measurement in young children with burns and can be used in practice and research. The VAS obs was found to be unreliable. Copyright (c) 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619968     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  7 in total

1.  Analgesia protocols for burns dressings: Challenges with implementation.

Authors:  S L Wall; D L Clarke; N L Allorto
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 2.  [Pain assessment scales in newborns: integrative review].

Authors:  Gleicia Martins de Melo; Ana Luíza Paula de Aguiar Lélis; Alline Falconieri de Moura; Maria Vera Lúcia Moreira Leitão Cardoso; Viviane Martins da Silva
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2014-12

3.  Pain Associated with Wound Care Treatment among Buruli Ulcer Patients from Ghana and Benin.

Authors:  Marike Alferink; Janine de Zeeuw; Ghislain Sopoh; Chantal Agossadou; Karibu M Abass; Richard O Phillips; Susanne Loth; Emma Jutten; Yves T Barogui; Roy E Stewart; Tjip S van der Werf; Ymkje Stienstra; Adelita V Ranchor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: an ESPNIC position statement for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Julia Harris; Anne-Sylvie Ramelet; Monique van Dijk; Pavla Pokorna; Joke Wielenga; Lyvonne Tume; Dick Tibboel; Erwin Ista
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale, the MBPS and the Observer Applied Visual Analogue Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.

Authors:  Dianne Crellin; Denise Harrison; Nick Santamaria; Franz E Babl
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Efficacy of oral ketamine compared to midazolam for sedation of children undergoing laceration repair: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Orit Rubinstein; Shiri Barkan; Rachelle Breitbart; Sofia Berkovitch; Michal Toledano; Giora Weiser; Natali Karadi; Anat Nassi; Eran Kozer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months.

Authors:  Dianne J Crellin; Denise Harrison; Adrian Hutchinson; Tibor Schuster; Nick Santamaria; Franz E Babl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.