Literature DB >> 20619680

Prevalence of de novo aortic insufficiency during long-term support with left ventricular assist devices.

Sang-Woo Pak1, Nir Uriel, Hiroo Takayama, Sarah Cappleman, Robert Song, Paolo C Colombo, Sandy Charles, Donna Mancini, Linda Gillam, Yoshifumi Naka, Ulrich P Jorde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as long-term therapy for end-stage heart failure patients. We compared the prevalence of aortic insufficiency (AI) after HeartMate II (HMII) vs HeartMate XVE (HMI) support and assessed the role of aortic root diameter and aortic valve opening in the development of AI.
METHOD: Pre-operative and post-operative echocardiograms of 93 HMI and 73 HMII patients who received implants at our center between January 2004 and September 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. After excluding patients with prior or concurrent surgical manipulation of the aortic valve, with baseline AI, or without baseline echoes, 67 HMI and 63 HMII patients were studied. AI was deemed significant if mild to moderate or greater. Pathology reports were reviewed for 77 patients who underwent heart transplant.
RESULTS: AI developed in 4 of 67 HMI (6.0%) and in 9 of 63 HMII patients (14.3%). The median times to AI development were 48 days for HMI patients and 90 days for HMII patients. For patients who remained on device support at 6 and 12 months, freedom from AI was 94.5% and 88.9% in HMI patients and 83.6% and 75.2% in HMII patients (log rank p = 0.194). Aortic root diameters, as determined by echocardiography for the patients with AI, trended to be larger at baseline (3.43 ± 0.43 vs 3.15 ± 0.40; p = 0.067) and follow-up (3.58 ± 0.54 vs 3.29 ± 0.50; p = 0.130) compared with those who did not have AI. Aortic root circumferences were assessed directly by a pathologist in those patients who underwent transplant and were significantly larger in HMII patients who had developed AI compared with those patients who did not (8.44 ± 0.89 vs 7.36 ± 1.02 cm; p = 0.034). Lastly, AI was more common in patients whose aortic valve did not open (11 of 26 vs 1 of 14; p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Aortic insufficiency occurs frequently in patients who receive continuous-flow support with a HMII LVAD, and may be associated with aortic root diameter enlargement and aortic valve opening. These findings warrant a more thorough preoperative patient evaluation and additional studies to investigate the factors, that may be associated with AI development.
Copyright © 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619680     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  39 in total

Review 1.  Management of aortic insufficiency in the continuous flow left ventricular assist device population.

Authors:  Jonathan Holtz; Jeffrey Teuteberg
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

2.  Shear stress and blood trauma under constant and pulse-modulated speed CF-VAD operations: CFD analysis of the HVAD.

Authors:  Zengsheng Chen; Sofen K Jena; Guruprasad A Giridharan; Michael A Sobieski; Steven C Koenig; Mark S Slaughter; Bartley P Griffith; Zhongjun J Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  [Ventricular long-term support with implantable continuous flow pumps: on the way to a gold standard in the therapy of terminal heart failure].

Authors:  T Krabatsch; E Potapov; S Soltani; M Dandel; V Falk; C Knosalla
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  The influence of pump rotation speed on hemodynamics and myocardial oxygen metabolism in left ventricular assist device support with aortic valve regurgitation.

Authors:  Kei Iizuka; Tomohiro Nishinaka; Yoshiaki Takewa; Kenji Yamazaki; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Impact of adverse events on ventricular assist device outcomes.

Authors:  Aleksandar Adzic; Snehal R Patel; Simon Maybaum
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-03

6.  Physiologic and hematologic concerns of rotary blood pumps: what needs to be improved?

Authors:  Tohid Pirbodaghi; Siavash Asgari; Chris Cotter; Kevin Bourque
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  The angle of the outflow graft to the aorta can affect recirculation due to aortic insufficiency under left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Kei Iizuka; Tomohiro Nishinaka; Daichi Akiyama; Hirohito Sumikura; Toshihide Mizuno; Tomonori Tsukiya; Yoshiaki Takewa; Kenji Yamazaki; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Preservation of native aortic valve flow and full hemodynamic support with the TORVAD using a computational model of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gohean; Mitchell J George; Kay-Won Chang; Erik R Larson; Thomas D Pate; Mark Kurusz; Raul G Longoria; Richard W Smalling
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Effects of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as observed by serial echocardiography.

Authors:  Carrie B Chapman; Salman Allana; Nancy K Sweitzer; Takushi Kohmoto; Margaret Murray; David Murray; Maryl Johnson; Peter S Rahko
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 1.724

10.  Development of a novel echocardiography ramp test for speed optimization and diagnosis of device thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia ramp study.

Authors:  Nir Uriel; Kerry A Morrison; Arthur R Garan; Tomoko S Kato; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Farhana Latif; Susan W Restaino; Donna M Mancini; Margaret Flannery; Hiroo Takayama; Ranjit John; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; Ulrich P Jorde
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.