Literature DB >> 20619647

Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy.

Isabelle Deshaies1, Louise Provencher, Simon Jacob, Gary Côté, Jean Robert, Christine Desbiens, Brigitte Poirier, Jean-Charles Hogue, Eric Vachon, Caroline Diorio.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that 4-54% of breast lesions reported on core biopsies as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) are upgraded on further excision to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma. We evaluated the rate of upgrading ADH to carcinoma at surgery for ADH diagnosed by percutaneous biopsy, and examined characteristics associated with malignancy. We identified 13,488 consecutive biopsies conducted at one center over a nine-year period. A total of 422 biopsies with ADH in 415 patients were included. DCIS or invasive carcinoma was found in 132 cases (31.3% upgrading). Multivariate model revealed that ipsilateral breast symptoms, mammographic lesion other than microcalcifications alone, 14G core needle biopsy, papilloma co-diagnosis, severe ADH and pathologists with lower volume of ADH diagnosis were factors statistically associated with malignancy. However, no subgroups were identified for safe clinical-only follow-up. Surgery is recommended in all cases of ADH diagnosed by percutaneous breast biopsy.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619647     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  17 in total

1.  The risk of upgrade for atypical ductal hyperplasia detected on magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy: a study of 100 cases from four academic institutions.

Authors:  Thaer Khoury; Zaibo Li; Souzan Sanati; Mohamed M Desouki; Xiwei Chen; Dan Wang; Song Liu; Rouzan Karabakhtsian; Prasanna Kumar; Beatriu Reig
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Prospective Analysis Using a Novel CNN Algorithm to Distinguish Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Breast.

Authors:  Simukayi Mutasa; Peter Chang; John Nemer; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Mary Sun; Alison McIlvride; Maham Siddique; Richard Ha
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Active surveillance of women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core needle biopsy may spare many women potentially unnecessary surgery, but at the risk of undertreatment for a minority: 10-year surgical outcomes of 114 consecutive cases from a single center.

Authors:  Gelareh Farshid; Suzanne Edwards; James Kollias; Peter Grantley Gill
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Atypical hyperplasia of the breast--risk assessment and management options.

Authors:  Lynn C Hartmann; Amy C Degnim; Richard J Santen; William D Dupont; Karthik Ghosh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Accuracy of Distinguishing Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Convolutional Neural Network-Based Machine Learning Approach Using Mammographic Image Data.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Jenika Karcich; Christine Chin; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Chen Huang; Xu Hua Hu; Xiao Ran Wang; Chao Xi Zhou; Fei Fei Wang; Shan Yang; Gui Ying Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on DCIS on core biopsy is associated with higher risk of upgrade than conventional atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Kate R Pawloski; Nicole Christian; Andrea Knezevic; Hannah Y Wen; Kimberly J Van Zee; Monica Morrow; Audree B Tadros
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB) excision of subcentimeter microcalcifications as an alternative to open biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Simone Schiaffino; Elena Massone; Licia Gristina; Piero Fregatti; Giuseppe Rescinito; Alessandro Villa; Daniele Friedman; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Positive predictive value for malignancy of uncertain malignant potential (B3) breast lesions diagnosed on vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB): is surgical excision still recommended?

Authors:  Marco Lucioni; Chiara Rossi; Pascal Lomoro; Francesco Ballati; Marianna Fanizza; Alberta Ferrari; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Emanuela Boveri; Giulia Meloni; Maria Grazia Sommaruga; Elisa Ferraris; Angioletta Lasagna; Elisabetta Bonzano; Marco Paulli; Adele Sgarella; Giuseppe Di Giulio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diagnostic value of radiomics and machine learning with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia in predicting malignant upgrade.

Authors:  Roberto Lo Gullo; Kerri Vincenti; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Peter Gibbs; Michael J Fox; Isaac Daimiel; Danny F Martinez; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth A Morris; Jeffrey S Reiner; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.