Literature DB >> 20619645

Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.

Kerry Davies1, Lyra Allan, Paul Roblin, David Ross, Jian Farhadi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is not only oncologically safe but provides also significant benefits both cosmetically and functionally. The superiority of this technique can only be fully established, however, by developing a framework for minimising complications. The present study seeks to elucidate the key factors affecting outcome.
METHODS: Data for all skin sparing mastectomies with immediate autologous and implant based reconstructions, performed in a three year period (2006-2008) was retrospectively collated. Complications were classified into major and minor. Patients were excluded who had flap loss due to vascular complications.
RESULTS: The total number analysed was 151. 17.2% had major complications, 23% had minor and 61% had no complications. The Wise and the "tennis" incision had significantly higher rates of wound dehiscence when compared with the periareolar incision (p = 0.025, p = 0.098). There was no significant difference between diathermy or blade dissection techniques, or the use of subcutaneous adrenaline infiltration. Increasing BMI was associated with increased skin flap necrosis and wound dehiscence, and an excised breast mass of greater than 750 g and a sternal notch to nipple length of greater than 26 cm are associated as well with increased flap-related complications (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0049).
CONCLUSION: Factors such as Wise pattern and tennis racquet incision, BMI and breast mass and sternal notch to nipple length adversely affect skin sparing mastectomy flap morbidity. These factors should be factored in to patient selection and operative planning especially for obese and large breasted women undergoing skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619645     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  33 in total

1.  Videoendoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Mustafa Tukenmez; Burcu Celet Ozden; Orhan Agcaoglu; Mustafa Kecer; Vahit Ozmen; Mahmut Muslumanoglu; Abdullah Igci
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Factors influencing the decision to pursue immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Philipp Wunschel; Erwin Heine; Luc J Strobbe
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Skin Flap Necrosis After Mastectomy With Reconstruction: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Cindy B Matsen; Babak Mehrara; Anne Eaton; Deborah Capko; Anastasia Berg; Michelle Stempel; Kimberly J Van Zee; Andrea Pusic; Tari A King; Hiram S Cody; Melissa Pilewskie; Peter Cordeiro; Lisa Sclafani; George Plitas; Mary L Gemignani; Joseph Disa; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

7.  Late Axillary Recurrence After Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy is Uncommon.

Authors:  Cindy Matsen; Kristine Villegas; Anne Eaton; Michelle Stempel; Aidan Manning; Hiram S Cody; Monica Morrow; Alexandra Heerdt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Clinical Approaches to Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Appropriate Reconstructive Procedure for My Patient?

Authors:  Max Dieterich; Adrian Dragu; Angrit Stachs; Johannes Stubert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

10.  Nipple sparing mastectomy and direct to implant breast reconstruction, validation of the safe procedure through the use of laser assisted indocyanine green fluorescent angiography.

Authors:  Roy de Vita; Ernesto Maria Buccheri
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.