Literature DB >> 2061900

Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting vs event monitoring: a comparison.

A P Fletcher1.   

Abstract

Spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is the mainstay of national and international drug safety evaluation in the post-approval phase. A major criticism of the method has been a high, but essentially unquantifiable, level of under-reporting by doctors. A direct comparison has been made between spontaneous ADR reporting and an observational event monitoring system for a group of more than 44,000 patients receiving one or other of a group of seven new drugs. The data suggests that under-reporting by the spontaneous system may be as high as 98% for several clinical events believed to be associated with drug treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2061900      PMCID: PMC1293280          DOI: 10.1177/014107689108400612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  3 in total

1.  Voluntary systems of adverse reaction reporting--Part III.

Authors:  J P Griffin; J C Weber
Journal:  Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev       Date:  1989

Review 2.  Voluntary systems of adverse reaction reporting--Part II.

Authors:  J P Griffin; J C Weber
Journal:  Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev       Date:  1986

3.  Voluntary systems of adverse reaction reporting--Part I.

Authors:  J P Griffin; J C Weber
Journal:  Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev       Date:  1985
  3 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacovigilance: towards a better understanding of the benefit to risk ratio.

Authors:  L S Simon
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Risk of drug-induced agranulocytosis: the case of calcium dobesilate.

Authors:  Pedro Zapater; José Francisco Horga; Antonio García
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Quantifying adverse drug events : are systematic reviews the answer?

Authors:  Mahyar Etminan; Bruce Carleton; Paula A Rochon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Predicting adverse drug events from personal health messages.

Authors:  Brant W Chee; Richard Berlin; Bruce Schatz
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

5.  Adverse event reporting for herbal medicines: a result of market forces.

Authors:  Rishma Walji; Heather Boon; Joanne Barnes; Zubin Austin; G Ross Baker; Sandy Welsh
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-05

6.  Is there still a role for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions?

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A 9-year evaluation of temporal trends in alosetron postmarketing safety under the risk management program.

Authors:  Kenneth Tong; Jean Paul Nicandro; Reshma Shringarpure; Emil Chuang; Lin Chang
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  Detection of adverse drug events and other treatment outcomes using an electronic prescribing system.

Authors:  Tewodros Eguale; Robyn Tamblyn; Nancy Winslade; David Buckeridge
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Informatic tools and approaches in postmarketing pharmacovigilance used by FDA.

Authors:  Joyce Weaver; Mary Willy; Mark Avigan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Improving the reporting of adverse drug reactions: a cluster-randomized trial among pharmacists in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria T Herdeiro; Jorge Polónia; Juan J Gestal-Otero; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.