Literature DB >> 20618310

Identification of differential aberrations in multiple-sample array CGH studies.

Huixia Judy Wang1, Jianhua Hu.   

Abstract

Most existing methods for identifying aberrant regions with array CGH data are confined to a single target sample. Focusing on the comparison of multiple samples from two different groups, we develop a new penalized regression approach with a fused adaptive lasso penalty to accommodate the spatial dependence of the clones. The nonrandom aberrant genomic segments are determined by assessing the significance of the differences between neighboring clones and neighboring segments. The algorithm proposed in this article is a first attempt to simultaneously detect the common aberrant regions within each group, and the regions where the two groups differ in copy number changes. The simulation study suggests that the proposed procedure outperforms the commonly used single-sample aberration detection methods for segmentation in terms of both false positives and false negatives. To further assess the value of the proposed method, we analyze a data set from a study that identified the aberrant genomic regions associated with grade subgroups of breast cancer tumors.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20618310      PMCID: PMC2955763          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01457.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  A perfect smoother.

Authors:  Paul H C Eilers
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses.

Authors:  Hanni Willenbrock; Jane Fridlyand
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Detection of DNA copy number alterations using penalized least squares regression.

Authors:  Tao Huang; Baolin Wu; Paul Lizardi; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Efficient calculation of interval scores for DNA copy number data analysis.

Authors:  Doron Lipson; Yonatan Aumann; Amir Ben-Dor; Nathan Linial; Zohar Yakhini
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Spatial smoothing and hot spot detection for CGH data using the fused lasso.

Authors:  Robert Tibshirani; Pei Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Arief Gusnanto; Kathleen O'Sullivan; Johan Staaf; Ake Borg; Yudi Pawitan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Stochastic segmentation models for array-based comparative genomic hybridization data analysis.

Authors:  Tze Leung Lai; Haipeng Xing; Nancy Zhang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 8.  Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH.

Authors:  S P Shah
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Authors:  D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interquantile Shrinkage and Variable Selection in Quantile Regression.

Authors:  Liewen Jiang; Howard D Bondell; Huixia Judy Wang
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Sequential model selection-based segmentation to detect DNA copy number variation.

Authors:  Jianhua Hu; Liwen Zhang; Huixia Judy Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Interquantile Shrinkage in Regression Models.

Authors:  Liewen Jiang; Huixia Judy Wang; Howard D Bondell
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.302

4.  Genome instability model of metastatic neuroblastoma tumorigenesis by a dictionary learning algorithm.

Authors:  Salvatore Masecchia; Simona Coco; Annalisa Barla; Alessandro Verri; Gian Paolo Tonini
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.