Literature DB >> 19287173

Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH.

S P Shah1.   

Abstract

Recurrent DNA copy number alterations (CNA) are widely studied in diagnostic and cytogenetic cancer research. CNAs reveal locations that may alter gene dosage and thus expression of the genes contained within. Array comparative genomic hybridization has emerged as a popular high-throughput, genome-wide technique to interrogate tumor genomes for copy number alterations. When studying a group of tumors derived from a patient cohort, it is of great interest to detect the copy number alterations that are common across the population and thus assumed to be potential diagnostic markers and/or predictors of clinical outcome. In this paper, we review extant and available computational approaches for detecting such recurrent copy number alterations from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) data. This is a challenging computational problem due to various sources of noise in the data that can obscure the recurrent copy number signals or induce false positives in their prediction. In this paper, we qualitatively evaluate methods designed to detect recurrent copy number alterations for aCGH data based on their analytical strengths and limitations, and discuss expected future directions in this important area of cancer research. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19287173     DOI: 10.1159/000184726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  9 in total

1.  Identification of differential aberrations in multiple-sample array CGH studies.

Authors:  Huixia Judy Wang; Jianhua Hu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Sequential model selection-based segmentation to detect DNA copy number variation.

Authors:  Jianhua Hu; Liwen Zhang; Huixia Judy Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Computational analysis of whole-genome differential allelic expression data in human.

Authors:  James R Wagner; Bing Ge; Dmitry Pokholok; Kevin L Gunderson; Tomi Pastinen; Mathieu Blanchette
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  DiNAMIC: a method to identify recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in tumors.

Authors:  Vonn Walter; Andrew B Nobel; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers.

Authors:  Craig H Mermel; Steven E Schumacher; Barbara Hill; Matthew L Meyerson; Rameen Beroukhim; Gad Getz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  A multi-sample based method for identifying common CNVs in normal human genomic structure using high-resolution aCGH data.

Authors:  Chihyun Park; Jaegyoon Ahn; Youngmi Yoon; Sanghyun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  TAGCNA: a method to identify significant consensus events of copy number alterations in cancer.

Authors:  Xiguo Yuan; Junying Zhang; Liying Yang; Shengli Zhang; Baodi Chen; Yaojun Geng; Yue Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Detection of recurrent copy number alterations in the genome: taking among-subject heterogeneity seriously.

Authors:  Oscar M Rueda; Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) Offers Clues to Differences Between the Genomes of Adult Philadelphia Positive ALL and the Lymphoid Blast Transformation of CML.

Authors:  Colin Grace; Elisabeth P Nacheva
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2012-09-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.