Literature DB >> 20615624

Tumor volume and metabolism of prostate cancer determined by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3T without endorectal coil reveal potential clinical implications in the context of radiation oncology.

Gilles Créhange1, Sébastien Parfait, Mélanie Liegard, Philippe Maingon, Douraïed Ben Salem, Alexandre Cochet, Mathilde Funes de la Vega, Luc Cormier, Franck Bonnetain, Céline Mirjolet, François Brunotte, Paul M Walker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether a relationship exists between the tumor volume (TV) or relative choline content determined using magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) at 3T and the clinical prognostic parameters for patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 72 men (mean age, 67.8 ± 6.2 years) were stratified as having low-risk (n = 26), intermediate-risk (n = 24), or high-risk (n = 22) PCa. MRSI was performed at 3T using a phased-array coil. Spectra are expressed as the total choline/citrate, total choline plus creatine/citrate, and total choline plus polyamines plus creatine/citrate ratios. The mean ratio of the most pathologic voxels and the MRSI-based TV were also determined.
RESULTS: The mean values of the total choline/citrate, total choline plus creatine/citrate, and total choline plus polyamine plus creatine/citrate ratios were greater for Stage T2b or greater tumors vs. Stage T2a or less tumors: 7.53 ± 13.60 vs. 2.31 ± 5.65 (p = .018), 8.98 ± 14.58 vs. 2.56 ± 5.70 (p = .016), and 10.32 ± 15.47 vs. 3.55 ± 6.16 (p = .014), respectively. The mean MRSI-based TV for Stage T2b or greater and Stage T2a or less tumors was significantly different (2.23 ± 2.62 cm(3) vs. 1.26 ± 2.06 cm(3), respectively; p = .030). This TV correlated with increased prostate-specific antigen levels (odds ratio, 1.293; p = .012). Patients with high-risk PCa had a larger TV than did the patients with intermediate-risk PCa. A similar result was found for the intermediate-risk group compared with the low-risk group (odds ratio, 1.225; p = .041).
CONCLUSION: Biomarkers expressing the relative choline content and TV were significant parameters for the localization of PCa and could be helpful for determining the prognosis more accurately.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20615624     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

Review 1.  Image-based biomarkers in clinical practice.

Authors:  John E Bayouth; Thomas L Casavant; Michael M Graham; Milan Sonka; Manickam Muruganandham; John M Buatti
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 2.  Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Molecular preservation by extraction and fixation, mPREF: a method for small molecule biomarker analysis and histology on exactly the same tissue.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Shuster; Raymond S Lance; Dean A Troyer
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-12-21

Review 4.  Current role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Romaric Loffroy; Olivier Chevallier; Morgan Moulin; Sylvain Favelier; Pierre-Yves Genson; Pierre Pottecher; Gilles Crehange; Alexandre Cochet; Luc Cormier
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  A decade in prostate cancer: from NMR to metabolomics.

Authors:  Elita M DeFeo; Chin-Lee Wu; W Scott McDougal; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study.

Authors:  Flavie Bratan; Emilie Niaf; Christelle Melodelima; Anne Laure Chesnais; Rémi Souchon; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Marc Colombel; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Uri Lindner
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-12-08

Review 8.  The potential role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mai Lin Nguyen; Brooke Willows; Rihan Khan; Alexander Chi; Lyndon Kim; Sherif G Nour; Thomas Sroka; Christine Kerr; Juan Godinez; Melissa Mills; Ulf Karlsson; Gabor Altdorfer; Nam Phong Nguyen; Gordon Jendrasiak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.