Literature DB >> 20615419

Specificity for homooligomer versus heterooligomer formation in integrin transmembrane helices.

Hua Zhu1, Douglas G Metcalf, Craig N Streu, Paul C Billings, William F Degrado, Joel S Bennett.   

Abstract

Transmembrane (TM) helices engage in homomeric and heteromeric interactions that play essential roles in the folding and assembly of TM proteins. However, features that explain their propensity to interact homomerically or heteromerically and determine the strength of these interactions are poorly understood. Integrins provide an ideal model system for addressing these questions because the TM helices of full-length integrins interact heteromerically when integrins are inactive, but isolated TM helices are also able to form homodimers or homooligomers in micelles and bacterial membranes. We sought to determine the features defining specificity for homointeractions versus heterointeractions by conducting a comprehensive comparison of the homomeric and heteromeric interactions of integrin alphaIIbbeta3 TM helices in biological membranes. Using the TOXCAT assay, we found that residues V700, M701, A703, I704, L705, G708, L709, L712, and L713, which are located on the same face of the beta3 helix, mediate homodimer formation. We then characterized the beta3 heterodimer by measuring the ability of beta3 helix mutations to cause ligand binding to alphaIIbbeta3. We found that mutating V696, L697, V700, M701, A703. I704, L705, G708, L712, and L713, but not the small residue-X(3)-small residue motif S699-X(3)-A703, caused constitutive alphaIIbbeta3 activation, as well as persistent focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation dependent on alphaIIbbeta3 activation. Because alphaIIb and beta3 use the same face of their respective TM helices for homomeric and heteromeric interactions, the interacting surface on each has an intrinsic "stickiness" predisposing towards helix-helix interactions in membranes. The residues responsible for heterodimer formation comprise a network of interdigitated side chains with considerable geometric complementarity; mutations along this interface invariably destabilize heterodimer formation. By contrast, residues responsible for homomeric interactions are dispersed over a wider surface. While most mutations of these residues are destabilizing, some stabilized homooligomer formation. We conclude that the alphaIIbbeta3 TM heterodimer shows the hallmark of finely tuned heterodimeric interaction, while homomeric interaction is less specific. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20615419      PMCID: PMC2935666          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  35 in total

1.  Oligomerization of the integrin alphaIIbbeta3: roles of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains.

Authors:  R Li; C R Babu; J D Lear; A J Wand; J S Bennett; W F DeGrado
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interhelical hydrogen bonding drives strong interactions in membrane proteins.

Authors:  F X Zhou; M J Cocco; W P Russ; A T Brunger; D M Engelman
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-02

3.  A push-pull mechanism for regulating integrin function.

Authors:  Wei Li; Douglas G Metcalf; Roman Gorelik; Renhao Li; Neal Mitra; Vikas Nanda; Peter B Law; James D Lear; William F Degrado; Joel S Bennett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transmembrane domain helix packing stabilizes integrin alphaIIbbeta3 in the low affinity state.

Authors:  Anthony W Partridge; Shouchun Liu; Sanguk Kim; James U Bowie; Mark H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Structure and function of the platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3.

Authors:  Joel S Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Structure-based prediction of bZIP partnering specificity.

Authors:  Gevorg Grigoryan; Amy E Keating
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Transmembrane glycine zippers: physiological and pathological roles in membrane proteins.

Authors:  Sanguk Kim; Tae-Joon Jeon; Amit Oberai; Duan Yang; Jacob J Schmidt; James U Bowie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Disrupting integrin transmembrane domain heterodimerization increases ligand binding affinity, not valency or clustering.

Authors:  Bing-Hao Luo; Christopher V Carman; Junichi Takagi; Timothy A Springer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structure of the conserved HAMP domain in an intact, membrane-bound chemoreceptor: a disulfide mapping study.

Authors:  Kalin E Swain; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Deciphering B-ZIP transcription factor interactions in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Charles Vinson; Asha Acharya; Elizabeth J Taparowsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-01-31
View more
  9 in total

1.  Tests of integrin transmembrane domain homo-oligomerization during integrin ligand binding and signaling.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jieqing Zhu; Timothy A Springer; Bing-Hao Luo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Identification of interacting hot spots in the beta3 integrin stalk using comprehensive interface design.

Authors:  Jason E Donald; Hua Zhu; Rustem I Litvinov; William F DeGrado; Joel S Bennett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Unique transmembrane domain interactions differentially modulate integrin αvβ3 and αIIbβ3 function.

Authors:  Rustem I Litvinov; Marco Mravic; Hua Zhu; John W Weisel; William F DeGrado; Joel S Bennett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Computational design of a β-peptide that targets transmembrane helices.

Authors:  Scott J Shandler; Ivan V Korendovych; David T Moore; Kathryn B Smith-Dupont; Craig N Streu; Rustem I Litvinov; Paul C Billings; Feng Gai; Joel S Bennett; William F DeGrado
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces death receptor 5 networks that are highly organized.

Authors:  Christopher C Valley; Andrew K Lewis; Deepti J Mudaliar; Jason D Perlmutter; Anthony R Braun; Christine B Karim; David D Thomas; Jonathan R Brody; Jonathan N Sachs
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Screening for transmembrane association in divisome proteins using TOXGREEN, a high-throughput variant of the TOXCAT assay.

Authors:  Claire R Armstrong; Alessandro Senes
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-07-22

7.  Implications of the differing roles of the β1 and β3 transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains for integrin function.

Authors:  Zhenwei Lu; Sijo Mathew; Jiang Chen; Arina Hadziselimovic; Riya Palamuttam; Billy G Hudson; Reinhard Fässler; Ambra Pozzi; Charles R Sanders; Roy Zent
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Molecular basis for protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Brandon Charles Seychell; Tobias Beck
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.883

9.  Isolated Toll-like receptor transmembrane domains are capable of oligomerization.

Authors:  James I Godfroy; Mohammad Roostan; Yurii S Moroz; Ivan V Korendovych; Hang Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.