Literature DB >> 20613468

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of propofol in children.

Agnes Rigouzzo1, Frederique Servin, Isabelle Constant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the best model to describe pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in prepubertal children and therefore to calculate the corresponding pharmacodynamic parameters. In addition, and to confirm our method, a group of postpubertal subjects was also studied.
METHODS: Sixteen children (9.5 yr, range 6-12) and 13 adults (22 yr, range 13-35) were included. Induction was performed by plasma target-controlled infusion of propofol (6 microg/ml) based on the Kataria model in children and on the Schnider model in adults. The relationship of bispectral index to predicted concentrations was studied during induction using the Kataria, pediatric Marsh, Schüttler, and Schnider models in children. Because the best performance was obtained, strangely enough, with the Schnider model, the two groups were pooled to investigate influence of puberty on pharmacodynamic parameters (kE0 [plasma effect-site equilibration rate constant] and Ce50 [effect-site concentration corresponding with 50% of the maximal effect]). The time-to-peak effect was calculated, and the kE0 was determined for the Kataria model (nonlinear mixed-effects modeling; pkpdtools).
RESULTS: In children, the predicted concentration/effect relationship was best described using the Schnider model. When the whole population was considered, a significant improvement in this model was obtained using puberty as a covariate for kE0 and Ce50. The time to peak effect, Tpeak (median, 0.71 [range, 0.37-1.64] and 1.73 [1.4-2.68] min), and the Ce50 (3.71 [1.88-4.4] and 3.07 [2.95-5.21] microg/ml) were shorter and higher, respectively, in children than in adults. The kE0 linked to the Kataria model was 4.6 [1.4-11] min.
CONCLUSIONS: In children, the predicted concentration/effect relationships were best described using the Schnider model described for adults compared with classic pediatric models. The study suggests that the Schnider model might be useful for propofol target-control infusion in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20613468     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e4f4ca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  14 in total

1.  Allometric or lean body mass scaling of propofol pharmacokinetics: towards simplifying parameter sets for target-controlled infusions.

Authors:  Johan Francois Coetzee
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  [Inhalation and intravenous anesthesia in pediatric patients].

Authors:  M Jöhr
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and dosing simulation of propofol maintenance anesthesia in severely obese adolescents.

Authors:  Vidya Chidambaran; Raja Venkatasubramanian; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Hope Esslinger; Shareen Cox; Jeroen Diepstraten; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Thomas Inge; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.556

4.  High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of propofol in human plasma: comparison of different heteroscedastic calibration curve models.

Authors:  Pooria Taghavi Moghaddam; Mohammad Reza Pipelzadeh; Sholeh Nesioonpour; Nader Saki; Saeed Rezaee
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol externally validated in children.

Authors:  Byung-Moon Choi; Hyun-Gu Lee; Hyo-Jin Byon; Soo-Han Lee; Eun-Kyung Lee; Hee-Soo Kim; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation.

Authors:  Vidya Chidambaran; Andrew Costandi; Ajay D'Mello
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Preoperative pregabalin has no effect on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for spinal deformities: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Linda Helenius; Antti Puhakka; Tuula Manner; Olli Pajulo; Ilkka Helenius
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Pulse transit time shows vascular changes caused by propofol in children.

Authors:  Joo-Eun Kang; In-Kyung Song; Ji-Hyun Lee; Min Hur; Jin-Tae Kim; Hee-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Suitable dental sedation monitored by electroencephalographic density spectral array: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiu Huang; Yu-Pin Feng; Chung-Tzu Hsueh
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.719

10.  Evaluation of propofol anesthesia in morbidly obese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Vidya Chidambaran; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Jeroen Diepstraten; Hope Esslinger; Shareen Cox; Beverly M Schnell; Paul Samuels; Thomas Inge; Alexander A Vinks; Catherijne A Knibbe
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.