Literature DB >> 20610740

Object-based attentional modulation of biological motion processing: spatiotemporal dynamics using functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography.

Ashley S Safford1, Elizabeth A Hussey, Raja Parasuraman, James C Thompson.   

Abstract

Although it is well documented that the ability to perceive biological motion is mediated by the lateral temporal cortex, whether and when neural activity in this brain region is modulated by attention is unknown. In particular, it is unclear whether the processing of biological motion requires attention or whether such stimuli are processed preattentively. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging, high-density electroencephalography, and cortically constrained source estimation methods to investigate the spatiotemporal effects of attention on the processing of biological motion. Directing attention to tool motion in overlapping movies of biological motion and tool motion suppressed the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response of the right superior temporal sulcus (STS)/middle temporal gyrus (MTG), while directing attention to biological motion suppressed the BOLD response of the left inferior temporal sulcus (ITS)/MTG. Similarly, category-based modulation of the cortical current source density estimates from the right STS/MTG and left ITS was observed beginning at approximately 450 ms following stimulus onset. Our results indicate that the cortical processing of biological motion is strongly modulated by attention. These findings argue against preattentive processing of biological motion in the presence of stimuli that compete for attention. Our findings also suggest that the attention-based segregation of motion category-specific responses only emerges relatively late (several hundred milliseconds) in processing.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610740      PMCID: PMC6632466          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1779-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

1.  Cortical network differences in the sighted versus early blind for recognition of human-produced action sounds.

Authors:  James W Lewis; Chris Frum; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; William J Talkington; Nathan A Walker; Kristina M Rapuano; Amanda L Kovach
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Task-Dependent Warping of Semantic Representations During Search for Visual Action Categories.

Authors:  Mo Shahdloo; Emin Çelik; Burcu A Ürgen; Jack L Gallant; Tolga Çukur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  The responsiveness of biological motion processing areas to selective attention towards goals.

Authors:  John Herrington; Charlotte Nymberg; Susan Faja; Elinora Price; Robert Schultz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effects of visual context upon functional connectivity during observation of biological motions.

Authors:  Magaly Hars; Mélany Hars; Cornelis J Stam; Claire Calmels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Brain Networks Responsible for Sense of Agency: An EEG Study.

Authors:  Suk Yun Kang; Chang-Hwan Im; Miseon Shim; Fatta B Nahab; Jihye Park; Do-Won Kim; John Kakareka; Nathanial Miletta; Mark Hallett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sensing, assessing, and augmenting threat detection: behavioral, neuroimaging, and brain stimulation evidence for the critical role of attention.

Authors:  Raja Parasuraman; Scott Galster
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Speed of human biological form and motion processing.

Authors:  George Buzzell; Laura Chubb; Ashley S Safford; James C Thompson; Craig G McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A comparison of FreeSurfer-generated data with and without manual intervention.

Authors:  Christopher S McCarthy; Avinash Ramprashad; Carlie Thompson; Jo-Anna Botti; Ioana L Coman; Wendy R Kates
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.