Literature DB >> 20610617

Implications of late complications from adhesions for preoperative informed consent.

Taufiek Konrad Rajab1, Umar Naeem Ahmad, Edward Kelly.   

Abstract

The process of informed consent is a critical aspect of the doctor-patient relationship. Doctors have a professional duty to provide patients with sufficient information if a treatment is associated with a significant risk. NHS guidelines advise doctors to mention risks that occur more frequently than 1-2% or risks that are serious even if the likelihood is very small. In the case of abdominal and pelvic surgery, risks can broadly be divided into early and late complications. Early complications, such as bleeding and infection, have a close temporal relationship with the operation. Such complications are routinely mentioned during the consent process. In contrast, postoperative adhesions cause changes in the normal anatomy that can adversely affect function many years and even decades after the original operation, leaving patients at lifelong risk for late complications. These late adhesive complications, namely bowel obstruction, mechanical female infertility and chronic pain, are often neglected during the consent process. However, the risks to patients from late adhesive complications are serious and well in excess of the accepted threshold where it could be considered a breach in the duty of care not to inform patients. This is reflected by a number of claims against the NHS based on consent issues regarding late adhesive complications of surgery. Therefore, late complications of surgery from adhesions should be included in the pre-operative consent process. This would decrease litigation costs but more importantly also underpins the doctor-patient relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610617      PMCID: PMC2913059          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.090378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  56 in total

Review 1.  Practicalities and costs of adhesions.

Authors:  M S Wilson
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 2.  Impact of adhesions in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  R Bhardwaj; M C Parker
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Treatment-dependent and treatment-independent pregnancy among women with periadnexal adhesions.

Authors:  T Tulandi; J A Collins; E Burrows; J F Jarrell; R A McInnes; W Wrixon; C W Simpson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy.

Authors:  R E Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Population-based analysis of the risk of adhesion-related readmissions after abdominal surgery in children.

Authors:  Hugh W Grant; Michael C Parker; Malcolm S Wilson; Donald Menzies; Graham Sunderland; Jeremy N Thompson; David N Clark; Alastair D Knight; Alison M Crowe; Harold Ellis
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Eur J Surg Suppl       Date:  1997

Review 7.  Adhesions and colorectal surgery - call for action.

Authors:  M C Parker; M S Wilson; H van Goor; B J Moran; J Jeekel; J-J Duron; D Menzies; S D Wexner; H Ellis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 8.  Medico-legal consequences of post-operative intra-abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Harold Ellis; Alison Crowe
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery.

Authors:  R Marana; M Rizzi; L Muzii; G F Catalano; P Caruana; S Mancuso
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Predictors of pelvic adhesions.

Authors:  T G Stovall; R F Elder; F W Ling
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 0.142

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of Mitomycin-C and sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose [NH/CMC] (Seprafilm) on abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Ismail Hakkı Ozerhan; Murat Urkan; Ulvi Mehmet Meral; Aytekin Unlu; Nail Ersöz; Funda Demirag; Gokhan Yagci
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-23

2.  Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence Presenting with Free Air 60 Days after Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy.

Authors:  D Munger; M Iannamorelli; C Galvez; C Service
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2017-10-02

Review 3.  What We Have Learned from Animal Models to Understand the Etiology and Pathology of Endometrioma-Related Infertility.

Authors:  Zhouyurong Tan; Sze-Wan Hung; Xu Zheng; Chi-Chiu Wang; Jacqueline Pui-Wah Chung; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  The effect of postoperative hyperbaric oxygen treatment on intra-abdominal adhesions in rats.

Authors:  Ming-Jenn Chen; Tzu-Yu Chen; Ya-Min Cheng; Yi-Chiang Hsu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The Improvement of Laparoscopic Surgical Skills Obtained by Gynecologists after Ten Years of Clinical Training Can Reduce Peritoneal Adhesion Formation during Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Valerio Mais; Michele Peiretti; Luigi Minerba
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.