Literature DB >> 20609650

Effect of magnetic navigation system on procedure times and radiation risk in children undergoing catheter ablation.

Bruno Schwagten1, Maarten Witsenburg, Natasja M S De Groot, Luc Jordaens, Tamas Szili-Torok.   

Abstract

Transcatheter ablation is an effective method to eliminate the arrhythmogenic substrate in symptomatic children with various types of arrhythmias. A reduction in the procedure and fluoroscopy time would decrease the hazardous effects of the ablation procedures. The magnetic navigation system (MNS) uses atraumatic catheters and facilitates accurate catheter placement in all regions of the heart for mapping and therapy delivery. We compared the efficacy and safety between a manual and MNS-guided approach for mapping and ablation of arrhythmias in a general pediatric arrhythmia population and in a subgroup of young children aged <10 years old. A total of 58 pediatric patients (mean age 12.2 +/- 3.2 years) were included in the present study. Of the 58 consecutive patients, 29 were treated with the MNS and 29 underwent conventional manual ablation. No demographic differences were present between the 2 groups. Acute success was achieved in 26 of 29 patients and 27 of 29 patients (p = NS). The mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were comparable in both study groups (168 +/- 56 minutes vs 183 +/- 52 minutes, p = NS; and 22 +/- 59 minutes vs 30 +/- 29 minutes, p = NS). In young children (aged <10 years), the success rate did not differ between the 2 groups (10 of 11 vs 6 of 8, p = NS). However, significant decreases in the procedure and fluoroscopy times were achieved (139 +/- 57 minutes vs 204 +/- 49 minutes and 13 +/- 7 minutes vs 31 +/- 28 minutes, respectively; p = 0.01 and p = 0.04). In conclusion, our data have strongly suggested that using the MNS for treating young children is advantageous, because it significantly reduced the procedure and fluoroscopy times without compromising efficacy. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20609650     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Radiation exposure and safety for the electrophysiologist.

Authors:  Sabine Ernst; Isabel Castellano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Accessory pathway ablation in a 6-year-old girl using remote magnetic navigation as an alternative to cryoablation.

Authors:  Lilian Mantziari; Michael Rigby; Janice Till; Sabine Ernst
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Accurate guidance of a catheter by ultrasound imaging and identification of a catheter tip by pulsed-wave Doppler.

Authors:  Eileen M McMahon; Panupong Jiamsripong; Minako Katayama; Hari P Chaliki; Mostafa Fatemi; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Radiation safety protocol using real-time dose reporting reduces patient exposure in pediatric electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Akash R Patel; Jamie Ganley; Xiaowei Zhu; Jonathan J Rome; Maully Shah; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Safety and efficacy of the remote magnetic navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardias--a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdi Akca; Ibrahim Önsesveren; Luc Jordaens; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Remote magnetic navigation shows superior long-term outcomes in pediatric atrioventricular (nodal) tachycardia ablation compared to manual radiofrequency and cryoablation.

Authors:  Anna M E Noten; Janneke A E Kammeraad; Nawin L Ramdat Misier; Sip Wijchers; Ingrid M van Beynum; Michiel Dalinghaus; Thomas B Krasemann; Sing-Chien Yap; Natasja M S de Groot; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-10-01

7.  Catheter ablation in children and young adults: is there an additional benefit from remote magnetic navigation?

Authors:  R W Roudijk; M Gujic; I Suman-Horduna; P Marchese; S Ernst
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.380

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.