Zhihong Yang1, Xiu-Fen Ming. 1. Vascular Biology, Department of Medicine, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains
globally the main cause of death and morbidity [1]. The underlying mechanism of
atherogenesis is multifactorial, involving functional changes of vascular cells
including endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, adventitial, and perivascular
cells, and circulating cells including platelets and inflammatory cells [2].
Clinical studies demonstrate that endothelial dysfunction reflected by
decreased bioavailability of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) derived from endothelial
NO-synthase (eNOS) is not only associated with atherosclerosis and risk factors
such as hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, advanced age, etc, but also predicts
the future clinical outcomes of patients [3]. The firm evidence for the role of
eNOS in anti-atherogenesis stems from early experimental studies demonstrating
accelerated atherosclerosis in ApoE
double knockout mice compared to ApoEmice [4]. Endothelial
dysfunction is therefore widely accepted as a fundamental pathophysiological mechanism
linking various cardiovascular risk factors to atherosclerosis. The
dysfunctional endothelial cells express elevated adhesion molecules such as
VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, thereby promoting monocyte-endothelial interaction
subsequently transmigration into the intima, where the monocytes mature to
macrophages, take up lipids, become foam cells, leading to atheroma plaque
formation [5].It is of note that at early to middle
stages of atherosclerosis and advanced age, eNOS protein level in the
vasculature is not decreased and even upregulated [6,7]. Much effort in the
past has therefore been made to investigate mechanisms that regulate NO bioavailability
at the eNOS enzymatic level. Among other mechanisms, an imbalance between eNOS
activity and oxidative stress seems critical for endothelial
dysfunction under the conditions [8]. Alone this line, strategies designed to
inhibit oxidative stress or to enhance eNOS enzyme activity are considered
promising therapeutic possibilities for prevention and/or treatment of
atherosclerosis. One of the targets which fulfils the therapeutic purpose is
the NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase sirtuin-1 (silent mating type
information regulation 2 homolog, SIRT1), whose activation has been shown to
exert numerous beneficial effects in many aspects including life-span expansion,
inhibition of endothelial senescence, inflammation, oxidative stress, and
beneficial regulation of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism [9].Most recent studies demonstrate that SIRT1 interacts
directly with eNOS, causes deacetylation of the enzyme at lysines 496 and 506
and posttranslationally enhances eNOS activity [10, 11]. The relationship
between SIRT1-eNOS signaling and atherosclerosis has been implicated recently
by Chen and colleagues [11], who show that SIRT1 level is higher in descending
thoracic aortas (atherosclerotic resistant region) than aortic arches
(atherosclerotic prone region) of C57BL6 mice. Importantly, another study by
Zhang and colleagues demonstrate that endothelial specific over-expression of
SIRT1 decreases atherosclerosis in ApoEmice [12]. The
present study by Stein and colleagues [13] take further the "loss-of-function"
experimental approach by using SIRT1mice to determine the role of endogenous SIRT1 on atherogenesis and endothelial
function. They show in a recently published study reduced atherosclerotic
lesion formation and inhibition of foam cell formation in SIRT1mice as compared to control ApoEmice [14], confirming the
atheroprotective role of SIRT1. In the current study, the authors provide further
information showing more pronounced plaque ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 levels in SIRT1mice and endothelial expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 upon in vivo
challenge with lipopolysaccharide to induce systemic inflammation. The
inhibitory role of SIRT1 in endothelial inflammatory responses is further
confirmed in cultured human aortic endothelial cells in response to TNF-α. An increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells in which SIRT1
is silenced by siRNA has been also demonstrated. The results support the
findings by various studies demonstrating anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative
effects of SIRT1 in endothelial cells. Surprisingly, no difference in
endothelium-dependent relaxations and eNOS-S1177 phosphorylation, an activating
mechanism of the enzyme between SIRT1
and ApoEmice is observed. It seems that there is
discrepancy between this study and the study by Zhang, et al. [12] who report
improved endothelium-dependent relaxations in endothelial specific SIRT1transgenic mice. The discrepancy may be explained by different experimental
conditions between the two studies. In the study by Zhang, endothelial function
is investigated in wild type and endothelial specific SIRT1 transgenic
mice fed high-fat-diet (HFD) for a relatively longer period i.e. 6 months,
while the atherosclerotic burden, unfortunately not the endothelial function,
is studied in ApoE and ApoE
endothelial SIRT1transgenic mice on HFD for 10 weeks, a protocol which
is similar to that used in the study by Stein. It seems that the food utilized
in the two studies is also different. Moreover, the protection of endothelial
function observed in the study by Zhang could be due to an over-expression of
the transgene SIRT1 which may exert much stronger effect than single SIRT1
allele deletion model used in the study by Stein. Another possible explanation
could be that the whole body single allele deletion of SIRT1 may readily
affect other cell functions such as monocytes/macrophages as demonstrated by
the authors in the same series of study [14], but may not be sufficient to
affect eNOS activity. This concern could be addressed by determining whether
eNOS acetylation level is indeed altered by single allele deletion of SIRT1
in their mouse model in the future experiments. Nevertheless, the study by
Stein and colleagues certainly further supports the hypothesis that
SIRT1 may be a promising therapeutic target to prevent or treat
atherosclerosis.
Authors: Xiu-Fen Ming; Christine Barandier; Hema Viswambharan; Brenda R Kwak; François Mach; Lucia Mazzolai; Daniel Hayoz; Jean Ruffieux; Sandro Rusconi; Jean-Pierre Montani; Zhihong Yang Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B van der Loo; R Labugger; J N Skepper; M Bachschmid; J Kilo; J M Powell; M Palacios-Callender; J D Erusalimsky; T Quaschning; T Malinski; D Gygi; V Ullrich; T F Lüscher Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2000-12-18 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Suowen Xu; Meimei Yin; Marina Koroleva; Michael A Mastrangelo; Wenbo Zhang; Peter Bai; Peter J Little; Zheng Gen Jin Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 5.682