Literature DB >> 20606083

Phase II, open-label study of pazopanib or lapatinib monotherapy compared with pazopanib plus lapatinib combination therapy in patients with advanced and recurrent cervical cancer.

Bradley J Monk1, Luis Mas Lopez, Juan J Zarba, Ana Oaknin, Carole Tarpin, Wichai Termrungruanglert, Jacquelyn A Alber, Jie Ding, Melissa W Stutts, Lini N Pandite.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pazopanib and lapatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu), respectively. In cervical cancer, EGFR and HER2/neu overexpression and high microvascular density correlate with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable stage IVB persistent/recurrent cervical carcinoma not amenable to curative therapy and at least one prior regimen in the metastatic setting were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to pazopanib at 800 mg once daily, lapatinib at 1,500 mg once daily, or lapatinib plus pazopanib combination therapy (lapatinib at 1,000 mg plus pazopanib at 400 mg once daily or lapatinib at 1,500 mg plus pazopanib at 800 mg once daily). Therapy continued until progression or withdrawal because of adverse events (AEs). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and safety. The futility boundary was crossed at the planned interim analysis for combination therapy compared with lapatinib therapy, and the combination was discontinued.
RESULTS: Of 230 patients enrolled, 152 were randomly assigned to the monotherapy arms: pazopanib (n = 74) or lapatinib (n = 78). Most patients (62%) had recurrent cancer. Pazopanib improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 90% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; P = .013) and OS (HR, 0.67; 90% CI, 0.46 to 0.99; P = .045). Median OS was 50.7 weeks and 39.1 weeks and RRs were 9% and 5% for pazopanib and lapatinib, respectively. The only grade 3 AE > 10% was diarrhea (11% pazopanib and 13% lapatinib). Grade 4 AEs were 9% (lapatinib) and 12% (pazopanib).
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the activity of antiangiogenesis agents in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer and demonstrates the benefit of pazopanib based on the prolonged PFS and favorable toxicity profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606083     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.9571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  83 in total

Review 1.  Targeting angiogenesis in advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ramez N Eskander; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 2.  Targeting angiogenesis in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Behrouz Zand; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.722

3.  PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ozlen Saglam; Jose Conejo-Garcia
Journal:  Integr Cancer Sci Ther       Date:  2018-04-14

4.  A Phase II Study of Pazopanib in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: NCCTG N0623 (Alliance).

Authors:  Kaushal Parikh; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Katie Allen-Ziegler; Brandt Esplin; Angelina D Tan; Benjamin Marchello; Alex A Adjei; Julian R Molina
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 5.  Antiangiogenics and immunotherapies in cervical cancer: an update and future's view.

Authors:  Daniela Luvero; Francesco Plotti; Salvatore Lopez; Giuseppe Scaletta; Stella Capriglione; Roberto Montera; Gianina Antonelli; Sara Ciuffreda; Raffaella Carassiti; Alice Oliveti; Roberto Angioli
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Evidence-Based Treatment Paradigms for Management of Invasive Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Krishnansu S Tewari; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Nonsurgical management of cervical cancer: locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease, survivorship, and beyond.

Authors:  Helen J Mackay; Lari Wenzel; Linda Mileshkin
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

8.  A phase II evaluation of brivanib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  John K Chan; Wei Deng; Robert V Higgins; Krishnansu S Tewari; Albert J Bonebrake; Michael Hicks; Stephanie Gaillard; Pedro T Ramirez; Weldon Chafe; Bradley J Monk; Carol Aghajanian
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Recent advances in the study of HPV-associated carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Liyan Jin; Zhi-Xiang Xu
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.327

10.  Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Krishnansu S Tewari; Michael W Sill; Harry J Long; Richard T Penson; Helen Huang; Lois M Ramondetta; Lisa M Landrum; Ana Oaknin; Thomas J Reid; Mario M Leitao; Helen E Michael; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.