BACKGROUND: Physicians could encounter difficult intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in trauma patients due to the patient's movement from continuous chest compression and to cervical stabilisation. Therefore, first, we evaluated the impact of chest compression with or without cervical stabilisation on intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope. Next, we compared difficulty in intubation among the Macintosh laryngoscope, AirWay Scope (AWS), and gum elastic bougie (GEB) with the Macintosh laryngoscope in three simulated CPR scenarios in a randomised, controlled, cross-over study design. METHODS: Twenty-three anaesthetists intubated the trachea of a manikin (ALS Skill Master, Laerdal Medical Japan, Tokyo, Japan) using the Macintosh laryngoscope, AWS, and GEB in the control scenario, chest compression scenario, and chest compression with cervical stabilisation scenario. Difficulty in intubation was rated on a 5-point scale and the intubation time was measured. RESULTS:Continuous chest compression increased difficulty in intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope, compared with the control scenario. Concurrent application of cervical stabilisation further increased the difficulty, compared with application of chest compression alone. Of the three devices compared, the AWS facilitated the easiest intubation, and the GEB facilitated the second-easiest intubation in all scenarios, though the intubation time was slightly longer with the GEB than with other devices. CONCLUSION:CPR employing continuous chest compression with or without cervical stabilisation caused difficult intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope. The AWS and GEB facilitated the easiest and second-easiest intubation, respectively, even during CPR employing continuous chest compression with or without cervical stabilisation in a manikin. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Physicians could encounter difficult intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in traumapatients due to the patient's movement from continuous chest compression and to cervical stabilisation. Therefore, first, we evaluated the impact of chest compression with or without cervical stabilisation on intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope. Next, we compared difficulty in intubation among the Macintosh laryngoscope, AirWay Scope (AWS), and gum elastic bougie (GEB) with the Macintosh laryngoscope in three simulated CPR scenarios in a randomised, controlled, cross-over study design. METHODS: Twenty-three anaesthetists intubated the trachea of a manikin (ALS Skill Master, Laerdal Medical Japan, Tokyo, Japan) using the Macintosh laryngoscope, AWS, and GEB in the control scenario, chest compression scenario, and chest compression with cervical stabilisation scenario. Difficulty in intubation was rated on a 5-point scale and the intubation time was measured. RESULTS: Continuous chest compression increased difficulty in intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope, compared with the control scenario. Concurrent application of cervical stabilisation further increased the difficulty, compared with application of chest compression alone. Of the three devices compared, the AWS facilitated the easiest intubation, and the GEB facilitated the second-easiest intubation in all scenarios, though the intubation time was slightly longer with the GEB than with other devices. CONCLUSION: CPR employing continuous chest compression with or without cervical stabilisation caused difficult intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope. The AWS and GEB facilitated the easiest and second-easiest intubation, respectively, even during CPR employing continuous chest compression with or without cervical stabilisation in a manikin. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Hyun Young Choi; Young Min Oh; Gu Hyun Kang; Hyunggoo Kang; Yong Soo Jang; Wonhee Kim; Euichung Kim; Young Soon Cho; Hyukjoong Choi; Hyunjong Kim; Gyoung Yong Kim Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 3.411