BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a commonly encountered entrapment disorder resulting from mechanical insult to the median nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based investigations have documented typical locations of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel; however, it is unclear whether those locations are consistent within an individual on different days. METHODS: To determine the day-to-day variability of nerve location, 3.0T MRI scans were acquired from six normal volunteers over multiple sessions on three different days. Half of the scans were acquired with the wrist in neutral flexion and the fingers extended, and the other half were acquired with the wrist in 35 degrees of flexion and the fingers flexed. Prior to half of the scans (in both poses), subjects performed a preconditioning routine consisting of specified hand activities and several repetitions of wrist flexion/extension. The shape, orientation, location, and location radius of variability of the median nerve and three selected flexor tendons were determined for each subject and compared between days. FINDINGS: Two of the six subjects had substantial variability in nerve location when the wrist was in neutral, and four of the subjects had high variability in nerve position when the wrist was flexed. Nerve variability was typically larger than tendon variability. The preconditioning routine did not decrease nerve or tendon location variability in either the neutral or the flexed wrist positions. INTERPRETATION: The high mobility and potential for large variability in median nerve location within the carpal tunnel needs to be borne in mind when interpreting MR images of nerve location. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND:Carpal tunnel syndrome is a commonly encountered entrapment disorder resulting from mechanical insult to the median nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based investigations have documented typical locations of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel; however, it is unclear whether those locations are consistent within an individual on different days. METHODS: To determine the day-to-day variability of nerve location, 3.0T MRI scans were acquired from six normal volunteers over multiple sessions on three different days. Half of the scans were acquired with the wrist in neutral flexion and the fingers extended, and the other half were acquired with the wrist in 35 degrees of flexion and the fingers flexed. Prior to half of the scans (in both poses), subjects performed a preconditioning routine consisting of specified hand activities and several repetitions of wrist flexion/extension. The shape, orientation, location, and location radius of variability of the median nerve and three selected flexor tendons were determined for each subject and compared between days. FINDINGS: Two of the six subjects had substantial variability in nerve location when the wrist was in neutral, and four of the subjects had high variability in nerve position when the wrist was flexed. Nerve variability was typically larger than tendon variability. The preconditioning routine did not decrease nerve or tendon location variability in either the neutral or the flexed wrist positions. INTERPRETATION: The high mobility and potential for large variability in median nerve location within the carpal tunnel needs to be borne in mind when interpreting MR images of nerve location. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Gail A Shafer-Crane; Ronald A Meyer; Marcy C Schlinger; D Lee Bennett; Kevin K Robinson; James J Rechtien Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: W D Middleton; J B Kneeland; G M Kellman; J D Cates; J R Sanger; A Jesmanowicz; W Froncisz; J S Hyde Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1987-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Stefanie Evers; Andrew R Thoreson; Jay Smith; Chunfeng Zhao; Jennifer R Geske; Peter C Amadio Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Mohammad Hosseini-Farid; Verena J M M Schrier; Julia Starlinger; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Yuexiang Wang; Chunfeng Zhao; Sandra M Passe; Anika Filius; Andrew R Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Anika Filius; Andrew R Thoreson; Yuexiang Wang; Sandra M Passe; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 3.494