Literature DB >> 20604852

Teaching and learning in morbidity and mortality rounds: an ethnographic study.

Ayelet Kuper1, Natalie Zur Nedden, Edward Etchells, Steven Shadowitz, Scott Reeves.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES In keeping with the current emphasis on quality improvement and patient safety, a Canadian division of general internal medicine began holding weekly morbidity and mortality rounds (M&MRs) with postgraduate trainees. Grounded in the medical education and social sciences literatures about such rounds, we sought to explore the teaching and learning processes that occur in M&MRs in order to understand their role in, and contribution to, the current medical education context. METHODS We conducted an ethnography of these M&MRs. We observed the rounds, conducted interviews with both staff doctors and residents and triangulated the resultant data. Concurrent, iterative data collection and analysis enabled sampling to saturation. RESULTS Staff doctors had differing understandings of the role of M&MRs and valued different kinds of teaching. They did not think they were teaching medical content knowledge at these rounds, but rather that they were role-modelling six skills, attitudes and behaviours, including 'identifying and addressing process and systems issues affecting care'. Residents primarily wanted to learn content knowledge and tried to extract such knowledge out of the rounds. They did recognise and value that they were learning about process and systems issues. They also agreed that staff doctors were role-modelling other things, but had varying perceptions of what those were; most did not value this role-modelled learning as much as they valued the acquisition of content knowledge. CONCLUSIONS These M&MRs were effective forums for addressing patient safety and quality improvement competencies. They carried none of the negative functions attributed to such rounds in the sociology literature, focusing neither on absolving responsibility nor on learning socially acceptable ways to discuss death in public. However, this study revealed a marked disjunction between the teaching valued by staff doctors and the learning valued by their trainees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20604852     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03622.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  11 in total

1.  "They Have to Adapt to Learn": Surgeons' Perspectives on the Role of Procedural Variation in Surgical Education.

Authors:  Tavis Apramian; Sayra Cristancho; Chris Watling; Michael Ott; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Contemporary management of paraesophaegeal hernias: establishing a European expert consensus.

Authors:  E M Bonrath; T P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Medical Residents and Interprofessional Interactions in Discharge: An Ethnographic Exploration of Factors That Affect Negotiation.

Authors:  Joanne Goldman; Scott Reeves; Robert Wu; Ivan Silver; Kathleen MacMillan; Simon Kitto
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Learning Outcomes from an Academic Internal Medicine Morbidity and Mortality Conference.

Authors:  Alexander R Fiorentino; Kelly A Kieffer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Evaluation of the implementation of a quality improvement program through morbidity and mortality reviews in a developing country.

Authors:  Oumayma Lahnaoui; Amine Souadka; Brahim El Ahmadi; Abdelilah Ghannam; Zakaria Belkhadir; Laila Amrani; Amine Benkabbou; Raouf Mohsine; Mohammed Anass Majbar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-24

6.  Enhancing clinical learning in the workplace: a qualitative study.

Authors:  K Magnier; R Wang; V H M Dale; R Murphy; R A Hammond; L Mossop; S L Freeman; C Anderson; M J Pead
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Mortality and morbidity meetings: an untapped resource for improving the governance of patient safety?

Authors:  Juliet Higginson; Rhiannon Walters; Naomi Fulop
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Barriers and facilitators to learn and improve through morbidity and mortality conferences: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marit S de Vos; Jaap F Hamming; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  At the Crossroad with Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: Lessons Learned through a Narrative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xin Xiong; Teela Johnson; Dev Jayaraman; Emily G McDonald; Myriam Martel; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-17

10.  Do "trainee-centered ward rounds" help overcome barriers to learning and improve the learning satisfaction of junior doctors in the workplace?

Authors:  Vikas Acharya; Amir Reyahi; Samuel M Amis; Sami Mansour
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.