Literature DB >> 20603785

Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.

C-Y Fu1, H-H Hsu, J-C Yu, G-C Hsu, K-F Hsu, D-C Chan, C-H Ku, T-C Lu, C-H Chu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 3, 4, and 5 in different age groups to investigate whether age influences the PPV of the BI-RADS category in breast ultrasound.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From our sonography-guided core biopsy database of breasts between 2006 and 2008, we identified 2817 BI-RADS category 3, 4, and 5 lesions with known pathological diagnosis in 2587 women, all of whom underwent the earlier breast assessment via ultrasound with a sonographic BI-RADS lexicon and later sonography-guided core biopsy. All lesions were classified into three age groups (< 45, 45 - 59, and > 59 years). The age-related PPVs of each BI-RADS category among three age groups were calculated on the basis of pathological diagnoses and were compared using a χ(2)-test.
RESULTS: The overall PPV of each BI-RADS category was 2.2 % in category 3, 6.5 % in category 4a, 35.2 % in category 4b, 79.6 % in category 4c, and 99.6 % in category 5. The age-related PPVs of category 3 varied significantly among the three age groups (0.9 % versus 3.9 % versus 2.0 % p = 0.048), and notably, the age-related PPV in group 2 was higher than the others. Additionally, there was a significant positive association between the age-related PPVs and increasing age in categories 4a and 4b (4a, p < 0.0001 and 4b, p = 0.0139), but not in categories 4c and 5 (4c, p = 0.1853 and 5, p = 0.2871).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of female breast cancer differs not only in different sonographic BI-RADS categories, but also in different age groups. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the special age group that we found for sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4a, and 4b. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20603785     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  4 in total

1.  Can unenhanced breast MRI be used to decrease negative biopsy rates?

Authors:  Sibel Kul; Şükrü Oğuz; İlker Eyüboğlu; Özlem Kömürcüoğlu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting?

Authors:  Yue Hu; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Liang Jin; Shiyu Shen; Fengtao Liu; Hongli Wang; Jingsi Mei; Xiaofang Jiang; Qiang Liu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.

Authors:  Seechad Noonpradej; Piyanun Wangkulangkul; Piyanoot Woodtichartpreecha; Suphawat Laohawiriyakamol
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Comparison of clinicopathological findings among patients whose mammography results were classified as category 4 subgroups of the BI-RADS.

Authors:  Ihsan Metin Leblebici; Suleyman Bozkurt; Turgut Tunc Eren; Ibrahim Ali Ozemir; Julide Sagiroglu; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2014-08-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.