Literature DB >> 20603783

Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography as compared to transient elastography and liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatopathies.

I Sporea1, R L Sirli, A Deleanu, A Popescu, M Focsa, M Danila, A Tudora.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare two methods of noninvasive assessment: transient elastography (TE) and acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study included 114 subjects: 38 healthy volunteers, (considered to have no fibrosis - F 0) and 76 patients with chronic liver disease: 53 who had undergone liver biopsy (LB) (7 with F 1, 24 with F 2, 22 with F 3 Metavir) and 23 previously diagnosed with cirrhosis (F4 Metavir). In each patient we performed a liver stiffness measurement by means of TE and ARFI. ARFI (shear wave velocity quantification) was performed at 3 points: at 0 - 1 cm, at 1 - 2 cm and at 2 - 3 cm under the capsule. For each depth, 5 valid measurements were made, and a median value was calculated, measured in m/sec.
RESULTS: A direct, strong, linear correlation (Spearman rho = 0.848) was found between TE and the stage of fibrosis (p < 0.001). A significant, direct correlation was found between ARFI measurements made 1 - 2 cm and 2 - 3 cm below the liver capsule and the severity of fibrosis (rho = 0.675 and 0.714 respectively). The subcapsularly measured ARFI values showed a poor correlation with fibrosis (rho = 0.469). The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was TE, with the area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.908, significantly larger than the AUROCs for ARFI. If only ARFI is considered, measurements made 1 - 2 and 2 - 3 cm below the capsule have the best predictive value, with AUROCs not significantly different from each other (0.767 and 0.731, respectively). For predicting fibrosis (F > 0), TE had the best predictive value: optimized cut-off 5.65 kPa (AUROC -0.898). For ARFI, the cut-offs were: 1.4 m/sec, AUROC -0.747 (1 - 2 cm), and 1.26 m/sec AUROC -0.721 (2 - 3 cm). For predicting cirrhosis (F = 4 Metavir), the optimized cut-offs were: TE -12.9 kPa (AUROC -0.994); ARFI - 1.78 m/sec for measurements made 2 - 3 cm below the capsule, AUROC - 0.951.
CONCLUSION: At present, liver elasticity evaluation by means of ARFI is not superior to TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis. For ARFI, the most reliable results are obtained if measurements are made 1 - 2 and 2 - 3 cm below the liver capsule. ARFI is an accurate test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20603783     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  42 in total

1.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of the liver: can fat deposition in the liver affect the measurement of liver stiffness?

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Yoshibumi Niitsuma; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Liver stiffness measurement using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography and effect of necroinflammation.

Authors:  Ki Tae Yoon; Sun Min Lim; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Kwang-Hyub Han; Chae Yoon Chon; Mong Cho; Jun Woo Lee; Seung Up Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Yoav Lurie; Muriel Webb; Ruth Cytter-Kuint; Shimon Shteingart; Gerardo Z Lederkremer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  ARFI elastography for the evaluation of diffuse thyroid gland pathology: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Ioan Sporea; Roxana Sirli; Simona Bota; Mihaela Vlad; Alina Popescu; Ioana Zosin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-28

5.  Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 2, Diagnostic Performance, Confounders, and Future Directions.

Authors:  An Tang; Guy Cloutier; Nikolaus M Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Serial change of liver stiffness measured by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in chronic liver disease: correlation with biochemical markers.

Authors:  Mansu Choi; Heejin Kwon; Jinhan Cho; Jongyoung Oh; Kyungjin Nam; Myungjin Kang; Eunju Kang; Sangyeong Han; Sungwook Lee
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 7.  Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Thierry Poynard; Laurent Castera
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Non invasive tools for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Maurizio Soresi; Lydia Giannitrapani; Melchiorre Cervello; Anna Licata; Giuseppe Montalto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Suraj Sharma; Korosh Khalili; Geoffrey Christopher Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Leonardo de Lucca Schiavon; Janaína Luz Narciso-Schiavon; Roberto José de Carvalho-Filho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.