Literature DB >> 20603498

Influence of seasonal variations in ambient temperatures on performance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: observational study from the Florence district.

Grazia Grazzini1, Leonardo Ventura, Marco Zappa, Stefano Ciatto, Massimo Confortini, Stefano Rapi, Tiziana Rubeca, Carmen Beatriz Visioli, Stephen P Halloran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in population screening has proved to be effective in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. In Italy a latex agglutination FOBT has been adopted for a single-sample screening programme. The aim of this study was to examine the performance of FOBTs in the Florence screening programme over several seasons to evaluate the impact of variations in ambient temperature on the performance of the screening test.
METHODS: Measured haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations were aggregated into seasons with their average ambient temperature (AAT). Using logistic regression, the AAT over the period preceding the test measurement was analysed. This period included the time between faecal sampling and return of the test sample (mean 7days) and the time in the laboratory refrigerator before analysis (mean 4days). The AAT from days 5-11 before analysis of the test sample was considered a determinant of test positivity. The Kruskal-Wallis rank test was used to evaluate the significance of seasonal and/or AAT-related differences in Hb concentration. A logistic regression model adjusted for sex, age, season and screening episode (first or repeated examination) was constructed.
RESULTS: 199 654 FOBT results were examined. Mean FOBT seasonal Hb concentrations (ng/ml) were: spring 27.6 (95% CI 26.2 to 29.1); summer 25.2 (95% CI 23.1 to 27.3); autumn 29.2 (95% CI 27.7 to 30.6); winter 29.5 (95% CI 27.9 to 31.1). Logistic regression showed that there was a 17% lower probability of the FOBT being positive in summer than in winter. The results of the logistic regression showed that an increase in temperature of 1°C produced a 0.7% reduction in probability of a FOBT being positive. In the summer the probability of detecting a cancer or an advanced adenoma was about 13% lower than in the winter.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there is a significant fall in Hb concentration at higher ambient temperatures. These results will have important implications for the organisation of immunochemical FOBT-based screening programmes, particularly in countries with high ambient temperatures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20603498     DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.200873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  33 in total

Review 1.  Fecal immunochemical tests compared with guaiac fecal occult blood tests for population-based colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; R Bryan Rumble; Frank Thompson; Michael Mills; Curtis Oleschuk; Alexandra Whibley; Hans Messersmith; Nancy Lewis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Tan Arulampalam; John D Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Performance of the fecal immunochemical test is not decreased by high ambient temperature in the rapid return system.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jae Jun Park; Jung Won Jeun; Jun Uk Lim; Sang-Hyun Hwang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Canadian guidelines for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jennifer J Telford
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: the past or the future.

Authors:  Sally C Benton; Helen E Seaman; Stephen P Halloran
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

6.  Learning to be More Positive About FIT.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colon Cancer Screening: Variable Performance with Ambient Temperature.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Christopher D Jensen; Stacey A Fedewa; Virginia P Quinn; Ann G Zauber; Joanne E Schottinger; Douglas A Corley; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  An Exploratory Analysis of Fecal Immunochemical Test Performance for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Nigeria.

Authors:  Gregory C Knapp; Avinash Sharma; Bolatito Olopade; Olusegun I Alatise; Olalekan Olasehinde; Olujide O Arije; Philip E Castle; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.