Literature DB >> 20601779

A computational method for estimating the dosimetric effect of intra-fraction motion on step-and-shoot IMRT and compensator plans.

Ben J Waghorn1, Amish P Shah, Wilfred Ngwa, Sanford L Meeks, Joseph A Moore, Jeffrey V Siebers, Katja M Langen.   

Abstract

Intra-fraction organ motion during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment can cause differences between the planned and the delivered dose distribution. To investigate the extent of these dosimetric changes, a computational model was developed and validated. The computational method allows for calculation of the rigid motion perturbed three-dimensional dose distribution in the CT volume and therefore a dose volume histogram-based assessment of the dosimetric impact of intra-fraction motion on a rigidly moving body. The method was developed and validated for both step-and-shoot IMRT and solid compensator IMRT treatment plans. For each segment (or beam), fluence maps were exported from the treatment planning system. Fluence maps were shifted according to the target position deduced from a motion track. These shifted, motion-encoded fluence maps were then re-imported into the treatment planning system and were used to calculate the motion-encoded dose distribution. To validate the accuracy of the motion-encoded dose distribution the treatment plan was delivered to a moving cylindrical phantom using a programmed four-dimensional motion phantom. Extended dose response (EDR-2) film was used to measure a planar dose distribution for comparison with the calculated motion-encoded distribution using a gamma index analysis (3% dose difference, 3 mm distance-to-agreement). A series of motion tracks incorporating both inter-beam step-function shifts and continuous sinusoidal motion were tested. The method was shown to accurately predict the film's dose distribution for all of the tested motion tracks, both for the step-and-shoot IMRT and compensator plans. The average gamma analysis pass rate for the measured dose distribution with respect to the calculated motion-encoded distribution was 98.3 +/- 0.7%. For static delivery the average film-to-calculation pass rate was 98.7 +/- 0.2%. In summary, a computational technique has been developed to calculate the dosimetric effect of intra-fraction motion. This technique has the potential to evaluate a given plan's sensitivity to anticipated organ motion. With knowledge of the organ's motion it can also be used as a tool to assess the impact of measured intra-fraction motion after dose delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601779     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/14/015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  The dosimetric effect of intrafraction prostate motion on step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans: magnitude, correlation with motion parameters, and comparison with helical tomotherapy plans.

Authors:  Katja M Langen; Bhavin Chauhan; Jeffrey V Siebers; Joseph Moore; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A method of dose reconstruction for moving targets compatible with dynamic treatments.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Mai Lykkegaard Schmidt; Paul Keall; Esben Schjodt Worm; Walther Fledelius; Lone Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Assessing the dosimetric impact of real-time prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Juan Diego Azcona; Lei Xing; Xin Chen; Karl Bush; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A comparison of the dosimetric effects of intrafraction motion on step-and-shoot, compensator, and helical tomotherapy-based IMRT.

Authors:  Ben J Waghorn; Robert J Staton; Justin M Rineer; Sanford L Meeks; Katja Langen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Real-time 4D dose reconstruction for tracked dynamic MLC deliveries for lung SBRT.

Authors:  Cornelis Ph Kamerling; Martin F Fast; Peter Ziegenhein; Martin J Menten; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A margin-based analysis of the dosimetric impact of motion on step-and-shoot IMRT lung plans.

Authors:  Benjamin J Waghorn; Amish P Shah; Justin M Rineer; Katja M Langen; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Assessment of MLC tracking performance during hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy using real-time dose reconstruction.

Authors:  M F Fast; C P Kamerling; P Ziegenhein; M J Menten; J L Bedford; S Nill; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.609

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.