Literature DB >> 20601707

The facing bias in biological motion perception: Effects of stimulus gender and observer sex.

Ben Schouten1, Nikolaus F Troje, Anna Brooks, Rick van der Zwan, Karl Verfaillie.   

Abstract

Under orthographic projection, biological motion point-light walkers offer no cues to the order of the dots in depth: Views from the front and from the back result in the very same stimulus. Yet observers show a bias toward seeing a walker facing the viewer (Vanrie, Dekeyser, & Verfaillie, 2004). Recently, we reported that this facing bias strongly depends on the gender of the walker (Brooks et al., 2008). The goal of the present study was, first, to examine the robustness of the effect by testing a much larger subject sample and, second, to investigate whether the effect depends on observer sex. Despite the fact that we found a significant effect of figure gender, we clearly failed to replicate the strong effect observed in the original study. We did, however, observe a significant interaction between figure gender and observer sex.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601707     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  Both right- and left-handers show a bias to attend others' right arm.

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Chiara Lucafò; Alessandra Pagliara; Romina Cappuccio; Alfredo Brancucci; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Emotional cues and social anxiety resolve ambiguous perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmet Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Action and emotion recognition from point light displays: an investigation of gender differences.

Authors:  Kaat Alaerts; Evelien Nackaerts; Pieter Meyns; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of looming and receding sounds on the perceived in-depth orientation of depth-ambiguous biological motion figures.

Authors:  Ben Schouten; Nikolaus F Troje; Jean Vroomen; Karl Verfaillie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Man, You Might Look Like a Woman-If a Child Is Next to You.

Authors:  Aenne A Brielmann; Justin Gaetano; Margarita Stolarova
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Direction of Biological Motion Affects Early Brain Activation: A Link with Social Cognition.

Authors:  Alan John Pegna; Elise Gehring; Georg Meyer; Marzia Del Zotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hands as sex cues: sensitivity measures, male bias measures, and implications for sex perception mechanisms.

Authors:  Justin Gaetano; Rick van der Zwan; Duncan Blair; Anna Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Further explorations of the facing bias in biological motion perception: perspective cues, observer sex, and response times.

Authors:  Ben Schouten; Alex Davila; Karl Verfaillie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Integration of 3D structure from disparity into biological motion perception independent of depth awareness.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Yi Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Emotion through locomotion: gender impact.

Authors:  Samuel Krüger; Alexander N Sokolov; Paul Enck; Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.