Literature DB >> 20601703

Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects.

Arni Kristjánsson1, Olafía Sigurjónsdóttir, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

Rewards have long been known to modulate overt behavior. But their possible impact on attentional and perceptual processes is less well documented. Here, we study whether the (changeable) reward level associated with two different pop-out targets might affect visual search and trial-to-trial target repetition effects (see Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994). Observers searched for a target diamond shape with a singleton color among distractor diamond shapes of another color (e.g., green among red or vice versa) and then judged whether the target had a notch at its top or bottom. Correct judgments led to reward, with symbolic feedback indicating this immediately; actual rewards accumulated for receipt at study end. One particular target color led to a higher (10:1) reward for 75% of its correct judgments, whereas the other singleton target color (counterbalanced over participants) yielded the higher reward on only 25% of the trials. We measured search performance in terms of inverse efficiency (response time/proportion correct). The reward schedules not only led to better performance overall for the more rewarding target color, but also increased trial-to-trial priming for successively repeated targets in that color. The actual level of reward received on the preceding trial affected this, as did (orthogonally) the likely level. When reward schedules were reversed within blocks, without explicit instruction, corresponding reversal of the impact on search performance emerged within around 6 trials, asymptoting at around 15 trials, apparently without the observers' explicit knowledge of the contingency. These results establish that pop-out search and target repetition effects can be influenced by target reward levels, with search performance and repetition effects dynamically tracking changes in reward contingency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601703     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  48 in total

1.  The right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Sarah C Krall; Lukas J Volz; Eileen Oberwelland; Christian Grefkes; Gereon R Fink; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Image toggling saves time in mammography.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Avi M Aizenman; Matthew B Thompson; Mark D Kovacs; Michael Trambert; Murray A Reicher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-10-12

3.  The role of reward prediction in the control of attention.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

5.  Converging structural and functional connectivity of orbitofrontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and posterior parietal cortex in the human striatum.

Authors:  Kevin Jarbo; Timothy D Verstynen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The differential effects of reward on space- and object-based attentional allocation.

Authors:  Jeongmi Lee; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Basal ganglia circuits for reward value-guided behavior.

Authors:  Okihide Hikosaka; Hyoung F Kim; Masaharu Yasuda; Shinya Yamamoto
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: from passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Styrmir Saevarsson; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills; Peter M Todd; David Lazer; A David Redish; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.