Literature DB >> 20600457

Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose.

S E Escher1, I Tluczkiewicz, M Batke, A Bitsch, C Melber, E D Kroese, H E Buist, I Mangelsdorf.   

Abstract

The thresholds of toxicological concern (TTCs) define limit values for substances of unknown toxicity below which dietary intake is considered to be of no concern to human health. The TTC concept has already been used for risk assessment of e.g. food contaminants or flavoring substances and is in discussion to be applied to other classes of compounds such as cosmetic ingredients, household products, non-relevant metabolites in drinking water, and impurities in pharmaceuticals. The present publication aimed to evaluate whether the current TTC concept can also be applied to define limit values for inhalation exposure, using a data set of 203 industrial chemicals from the database RepDose. It has been shown, that the NOEC values in classes 1, 2, and 3 are distributed over six orders of magnitude resulting in a considerable overlap between the distribution curves for the three classes. Inhalation thresholds for Cramer classes 1 (compounds likely to be of low-toxicity), 2 (compounds likely to be of moderate toxicity), and 3 (compounds suspect for high toxicity) were analyzed close to the approach described by Munro for oral TTCs. The 5th percentiles NOEC of Cramer classes 1-3 result in thresholds of 1.5×10(-3) ppm for Cramer class 1 and 2.2×10(-5) ppm for Cramer class 3. A threshold could not be derived for class 2 because of the small number of compounds available. If calculated as body doses, the inhalation thresholds for classes 1 and 3 (71 and 4 μg/person/d, respectively) are considerably lower than the oral thresholds derived by Munro (1800 and 90 μg/person/d). It has been shown that one reason for this difference is the high sensitivity of the respiratory tract to local effects. In a next step, the values obtained were further refined. If organophosphates or compounds with structural alerts for genotoxicity are excluded, the TTC in Cramer class 1 increases, whereas the TTC in Cramer class 3 remains the same. Based on these analyses two inhalation TTCs for non-genotoxic compounds are proposed: 3.6×10(-3) ppm (180 μg/person/d) for Cramer class 1 and 2.4×10(-5)ppm (4 μg/person/d) for Cramer class 3.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600457     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  10 in total

1.  The Threshold of Toxicological Concern for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits.

Authors:  B van Ravenzwaay; X Jiang; T Luechtefeld; T Hartung
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Use of In Silico Methods for Regulatory Toxicological Assessment of Pharmaceutical Impurities.

Authors:  Simona Kovarich; Claudia Ileana Cappelli
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Editorial: Advances and Refinements in the Development and Application of Threshold of Toxicological Concern.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz; Andrew Worth; Chihae Yang; Tingting Zhu
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 4.  Hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Reinskje Talhout; Thomas Schulz; Ewa Florek; Jan van Benthem; Piet Wester; Antoon Opperhuizen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Development of screening tools for the interpretation of chemical biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Richard A Becker; Sean M Hays; Steven Robison; Lesa L Aylward
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-16

6.  Threshold of Toxicological Concern-An Update for Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens.

Authors:  Monika Batke; Fatemeh Moradi Afrapoli; Rupert Kellner; James F Rathman; Chihae Yang; Mark T D Cronin; Sylvia E Escher
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-24

7.  Derivation of New Threshold of Toxicological Concern Values for Exposure via Inhalation for Environmentally-Relevant Chemicals.

Authors:  Mark D Nelms; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-16

8.  Advances in acute toxicity testing: strengths, weaknesses and regulatory acceptance.

Authors:  Earnest Oghenesuvwe Erhirhie; Chibueze Peter Ihekwereme; Emmanuel Emeka Ilodigwe
Journal:  Interdiscip Toxicol       Date:  2018-08-06

9.  Defining the Human-Biota Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for Organic Chemicals in Freshwater: The Proposed Strategy of the LIFE VERMEER Project Using VEGA Tools.

Authors:  Diego Baderna; Roberta Faoro; Gianluca Selvestrel; Adrien Troise; Davide Luciani; Sandrine Andres; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Flavour chemicals, synthetic coolants and pulegone in popular mint-flavoured and menthol-flavoured e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Esther E Omaiye; Wentai Luo; Kevin J McWhirter; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 6.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.