Literature DB >> 28645885

The Threshold of Toxicological Concern for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats and rabbits.

B van Ravenzwaay1, X Jiang2, T Luechtefeld3, T Hartung4.   

Abstract

The Threshold Toxicological Concern (TTC) is based on the concept that in absence of experimental data reasonable assurance of safety can be given if exposure is sufficiently low. Using the REACH database the low 5th percentile of the NO(A)EL distribution, for prenatal developmental toxicity (OECD guideline 414) was determined. For rats, (434 NO(A)ELs values) for maternal toxicity, this value was 10 mg/kg-bw/day. For developmental toxicity (469 NO(A)ELs): 13 mg/kg-bw/day. For rabbits, (100 NO(A)ELs), the value for maternal toxicity was 4 mg/kg-bw/day, for developmental toxicity, (112 NO(A)EL values): 10 mg/kg-bw/day. The maternal organism may thus be slightly more sensitive than the fetus. Combining REACH- (industrial chemicals) and published BASF-data (mostly agrochemicals), 537 unique compounds with NO(A)EL values for developmental toxicity in rats and 150 in rabbits were evaluated. The low 5th percentile NO(A)EL for developmental toxicity in rats was 10 mg/kg-bw/day and 9.5 mg/kg-bw/day for rabbits. Using an assessment factor of 100, a TTC value for developmental toxicity of 100 μg/kg-bw/day for rats and 95 μg/kg-bw/day for rabbits is calculated. These values could serve as guidance whether or not to perform an animal experiment, if exposure is sufficiently low. In emergency situations this value may be useful for a first tier risk assessment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental toxicity; NOAEL; Rabbit; Rat; TTC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28645885      PMCID: PMC5963679          DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  30 in total

Review 1.  A procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.

Authors:  I C Munro; E Kennepohl; R Kroes
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1999 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 6.023

2.  Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet. Report of a workshop, 5-6 October 1999, Paris, France.

Authors:  S M Barlow; G Kozianowski; G Würtzen; J Schlatter
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 3.  Toxicology databases and the concept of thresholds of toxicological concern as used by the JECFA for the safety evaluation of flavouring agents.

Authors:  A G Renwick
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 4.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations.

Authors:  David G Dolan; Bruce D Naumann; Edward V Sargent; Andrew Maier; Michael Dourson
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Exposure-triggered reproductive toxicity testing under the REACH legislation: a proposal to define significant/relevant exposure.

Authors:  Ulrike Bernauer; Gerhard Heinemeyer; Barbara Heinrich-Hirsch; Beate Ulbrich; Ursula Gundert-Remy
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.372

6.  Read-across approaches--misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz; Nicholas Ball; Richard A Becker; Ewan D Booth; Mark T D Cronin; Dinant Kroese; David Steup; Ben van Ravenzwaay; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 7.  Estimation of toxic hazard--a decision tree approach.

Authors:  G M Cramer; R A Ford; R L Hall
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1978-06

Review 8.  Application of the "threshold of toxicological concern" to derive tolerable concentrations of "non-relevant metabolites" formed from plant protection products in ground and drinking water.

Authors:  Stephanie Melching-Kollmuss; Wolfgang Dekant; Fritz Kalberlah
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Global analysis of publicly available safety data for 9,801 substances registered under REACH from 2008-2014.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Daniel P Russo; Costanza Rovida; Hao Zhu; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.043

10.  Analysis of public oral toxicity data from REACH registrations 2008-2014.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Daniel P Russo; Costanza Rovida; Hao Zhu; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.043

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Big-data and machine learning to revamp computational toxicology and its use in risk assessment.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Craig Rowlands; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Avoiding Regrettable Substitutions: Green Toxicology for Sustainable Chemistry.

Authors:  Alexandra Maertens; Emily Golden; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 9.224

3.  3S - Systematic, systemic, and systems biology and toxicology.

Authors:  Lena Smirnova; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Raffaella Corvi; Andre Levchenko; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Focusing Points on FSCJ's Guideline Recently Established: Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Masahiro Nakamoto
Journal:  Food Saf (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-06-24

5.  Machine Learning of Toxicological Big Data Enables Read-Across Structure Activity Relationships (RASAR) Outperforming Animal Test Reproducibility.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Dan Marsh; Craig Rowlands; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.