Literature DB >> 20600235

Global saccadic adaptation.

Martin Rolfs1, Tomas Knapen, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Our actions need constant calibration to arrive accurately at locations of their intended goals; errors in execution must drive rapid adjustments. As an example, saccadic eye movements are vital for bringing objects of interest into the high-acuity center of vision and they must be continually tuned to compensate for ongoing changes in body, muscle strength and neural variability. This adaptation of eye movement responses can be induced artificially by systematically displacing the saccade targets by a constant proportion during each saccade. Observers do not notice these shifts and yet the oculomotor system does, rapidly compensating for the landing error until the saccades finally land close to the artificially displaced target. This recalibration has been described as spatially selective, dropping off with distance in direction and amplitude from the adapted saccade vector. However, we now report that this local adaptation property is a consequence of adapting to only one direction at a time, the method generally used in previous studies. When we induced adaptation in all directions, using a quasi-random walk where each target was displaced 25% back toward to the previous fixation, we found strong, spatially generalized adaptation that could not be accounted for by an accumulation of many vector-specific adaptations. This global adaptation is a plausible strategy for calibration given the absence of any obvious growth changes or muscle deficits that would lead to vector specific losses and it provides a robust model for testing motor calibration. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600235     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  Saccade performance in the nasal and temporal hemifields.

Authors:  Omar I Jóhannesson; Arni Gunnar Asgeirsson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Fine-scale plasticity of microscopic saccades.

Authors:  Katharina Havermann; Claudia Cherici; Michele Rucci; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Saccadic adaptation to a systematically varying disturbance.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Adaptation and adaptation transfer characteristics of five different saccade types in the monkey.

Authors:  Yoshiko Kojima; Albert F Fuchs; Robijanto Soetedjo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Distorted object perception following whole-field adaptation of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Tyler W Garaas; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Short-term adaptations of the dynamic disparity vergence and phoria systems.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Vincent R Vicci; Bérangère Granger-Donetti; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Target Displacements during Eye Blinks Trigger Automatic Recalibration of Gaze Direction.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Marianne Duyck; Matteo Lisi; Thérèse Collins; David Whitney; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Long-term size-increasing adaptation of saccades in macaques.

Authors:  A L Mueller; A J Davis; F R Robinson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Visuomotor learning from postdictive motor error.

Authors:  Jana Masselink; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods.

Authors:  M J Morgan; D Melmoth; J A Solomon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.