Literature DB >> 20600107

Action of the chaperonin GroEL/ES on a non-native substrate observed with single-molecule FRET.

So Yeon Kim1, Erik J Miller, Judith Frydman, W E Moerner.   

Abstract

The double ring-shaped chaperonin GroEL binds a wide range of non-native polypeptides within its central cavity and, together with its cofactor GroES, assists their folding in an ATP-dependent manner. The conformational cycle of GroEL/ES has been studied extensively but little is known about how the environment in the central cavity affects substrate conformation. Here, we use the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein VHL as a model substrate for studying the action of the GroEL/ES system on a bound polypeptide. Fluorescent labeling of pairs of sites on VHL for fluorescence (Förster) resonant energy transfer (FRET) allows VHL to be used to explore how GroEL binding and GroEL/ES/nucleotide binding affect the substrate conformation. On average, upon binding to GroEL, all pairs of labeling sites experience compaction relative to the unfolded protein while single-molecule FRET distributions show significant heterogeneity. Upon addition of GroES and ATP to close the GroEL cavity, on average further FRET increases occur between the two hydrophobic regions of VHL, accompanied by FRET decreases between the N- and C-termini. This suggests that ATP- and GroES-induced confinement within the GroEL cavity remodels bound polypeptides by causing expansion (or racking) of some regions and compaction of others, most notably, the hydrophobic core. However, single-molecule observations of the specific FRET changes for individual proteins at the moment of ATP/GroES addition reveal that a large fraction of the population shows the opposite behavior; that is, FRET decreases between the hydrophobic regions and FRET increases for the N- and C-termini. Our time-resolved single-molecule analysis reveals the underlying heterogeneity of the action of GroES/EL on a bound polypeptide substrate, which might arise from the random nature of the specific binding to the various identical subunits of GroEL, and might help explain why multiple rounds of binding and hydrolysis are required for some chaperonin substrates. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600107      PMCID: PMC2927214          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  48 in total

1.  Tumorigenic mutations in VHL disrupt folding in vivo by interfering with chaperonin binding.

Authors:  Douglas E Feldman; Christoph Spiess; Daniel E Howard; Judith Frydman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Random-coil behavior and the dimensions of chemically unfolded proteins.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kohn; Ian S Millett; Jaby Jacob; Bojan Zagrovic; Thomas M Dillon; Nikolina Cingel; Robin S Dothager; Soenke Seifert; P Thiyagarajan; Tobin R Sosnick; M Zahid Hasan; Vijay S Pande; Ingo Ruczinski; Sebastian Doniach; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  No evidence for a forced-unfolding mechanism during ATP/GroES binding to substrate-bound GroEL: no observable protection of metastable Rubisco intermediate or GroEL-bound Rubisco from tritium exchange.

Authors:  Eun Sun Park; Wayne A Fenton; Arthur L Horwich
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Two-Photon Fluorescence Excitation Cross Sections of Biomolecular Probes from 690 to 960 nm.

Authors:  M A Albota; C Xu; W W Webb
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 1.980

5.  Potential for modulation of the hydrophobic effect inside chaperonins.

Authors:  Jeremy L England; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Monitoring protein conformation along the pathway of chaperonin-assisted folding.

Authors:  Shruti Sharma; Kausik Chakraborty; Barbara K Müller; Nagore Astola; Yun-Chi Tang; Don C Lamb; Manajit Hayer-Hartl; F Ulrich Hartl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate.

Authors:  J Martin; T Langer; R Boteva; A Schramel; A L Horwich; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES.

Authors:  J S Weissman; C M Hohl; O Kovalenko; Y Kashi; S Chen; K Braig; H R Saibil; W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-17       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Alexa and Oregon Green dyes as fluorescence anisotropy probes for measuring protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions.

Authors:  Elena Rusinova; Vira Tretyachenko-Ladokhina; Oana E Vele; Donald F Senear; J B Alexander Ross
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.365

10.  Folding trajectories of human dihydrofolate reductase inside the GroEL GroES chaperonin cavity and free in solution.

Authors:  Reto Horst; Wayne A Fenton; S Walter Englander; Kurt Wüthrich; Arthur L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Live-cell imaging of single receptor composition using zero-mode waveguide nanostructures.

Authors:  Christopher I Richards; Khai Luong; Rahul Srinivasan; Stephen W Turner; Dennis A Dougherty; Jonas Korlach; Henry A Lester
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 11.189

2.  Single-molecule resolution of protein structure and interfacial dynamics on biomaterial surfaces.

Authors:  Sean Yu McLoughlin; Mark Kastantin; Daniel K Schwartz; Joel L Kaar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Repetitive protein unfolding by the trans ring of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex stimulates folding.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Jason Puchalla; Daniel Shoup; Hays S Rye
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Subunit conformational variation within individual GroEL oligomers resolved by Cryo-EM.

Authors:  Soung-Hun Roh; Corey F Hryc; Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Xue Fei; Joanita Jakana; George H Lorimer; Wah Chiu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mechanisms of cellular proteostasis: insights from single-molecule approaches.

Authors:  Carlos J Bustamante; Christian M Kaiser; Rodrigo A Maillard; Daniel H Goldman; Christian A M Wilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.981

6.  Functional Subunits of Eukaryotic Chaperonin CCT/TRiC in Protein Folding.

Authors:  M Anaul Kabir; Wasim Uddin; Aswathy Narayanan; Praveen Kumar Reddy; M Aman Jairajpuri; Fred Sherman; Zulfiqar Ahmad
Journal:  J Amino Acids       Date:  2011-07-02

7.  Single Molecule Analysis Research Tool (SMART): an integrated approach for analyzing single molecule data.

Authors:  Max Greenfeld; Dmitri S Pavlichin; Hideo Mabuchi; Daniel Herschlag
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quantitative proteome-level analysis of paulownia witches' broom disease with methyl methane sulfonate assistance reveals diverse metabolic changes during the infection and recovery processes.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Wenshan Liu; Guoqiang Fan; Xiaoqiao Zhai; Zhenli Zhao; Yanpeng Dong; Minjie Deng; Yabing Cao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  pVHL-mediated SMAD3 degradation suppresses TGF-β signaling.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Yasamin Dabiri; Rodrigo A Gama-Brambila; Shahrouz Ghafoory; Mukaddes Altinbay; Arianeb Mehrabi; Mohammad Golriz; Biljana Blagojevic; Stefanie Reuter; Kang Han; Anna Seidel; Ivan Đikić; Stefan Wölfl; Xinlai Cheng
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.077

10.  Nucleotide-induced conformational changes of tetradecameric GroEL mapped by H/D exchange monitored by FT-ICR mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Jin Chen; Kunihiro Kuwajima; Hui-Min Zhang; Feng Xian; Nicolas L Young; Alan G Marshall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.