BACKGROUND: Pittsburgh Compound B ([¹¹C] PiB) is a specific positron emission tomography (PET) marker of cerebral amyloid deposits. Only few data have been published on in vivo longitudinal changes of amyloid load in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, with conflicting results. Therefore, little is known about the factors that influence these changes. METHODS: A group of 24 patients with probable AD diagnosed by combining established clinical criteria with an AD-typical pattern in [(18)F] fluoro-deoxy-glucose PET underwent [¹¹C] PiB-PET examinations at baseline and after 24 months. The difference of amyloid load between the two examinations and the association with clinical and neurobiological variables was examined with a regions-of-interest approach and voxel-based analyses. RESULTS: Cerebral [¹¹C] PiB uptake ratio increased significantly by an annual rate of 3.92%. Although the increase occurred in all parts of the neocortex, no increase was detected in the archipallium. The increase was gene-dose-dependent (analysis of variance p = .012) to the number of apolipoprotein E ε4 alleles. Progression of dementia symptoms was correlated to the [¹¹C] PiB increase in numerous regions associated with cognition. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a significant increase of amyloid deposition occurs in patients with AD during a relatively short interval of its clinical course. The rate of amyloid aggregation rate is closely associated with the apolipoprotein E genotype, which might be important for the evaluation of antiamyloid drug treatment effects. The present study further emphasizes the value of amyloid-plaque imaging as a marker of disease progression and as a potential surrogate marker to be used in antiamyloid drug trials.
BACKGROUND:Pittsburgh Compound B ([¹¹C] PiB) is a specific positron emission tomography (PET) marker of cerebral amyloid deposits. Only few data have been published on in vivo longitudinal changes of amyloid load in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, with conflicting results. Therefore, little is known about the factors that influence these changes. METHODS: A group of 24 patients with probable AD diagnosed by combining established clinical criteria with an AD-typical pattern in [(18)F] fluoro-deoxy-glucose PET underwent [¹¹C] PiB-PET examinations at baseline and after 24 months. The difference of amyloid load between the two examinations and the association with clinical and neurobiological variables was examined with a regions-of-interest approach and voxel-based analyses. RESULTS: Cerebral [¹¹C] PiB uptake ratio increased significantly by an annual rate of 3.92%. Although the increase occurred in all parts of the neocortex, no increase was detected in the archipallium. The increase was gene-dose-dependent (analysis of variance p = .012) to the number of apolipoprotein E ε4 alleles. Progression of dementia symptoms was correlated to the [¹¹C] PiB increase in numerous regions associated with cognition. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a significant increase of amyloid deposition occurs in patients with AD during a relatively short interval of its clinical course. The rate of amyloid aggregation rate is closely associated with the apolipoprotein E genotype, which might be important for the evaluation of antiamyloid drug treatment effects. The present study further emphasizes the value of amyloid-plaque imaging as a marker of disease progression and as a potential surrogate marker to be used in antiamyloid drug trials.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Timo Grimmer; Gjermund Henriksen; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Hans Förstl; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Alexander Kurz; Alexander Drzezga Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: G Gold; E Kövari; G Corte; F R Herrmann; A Canuto; T Bussière; P R Hof; C Bouras; P Giannakopoulos Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: William E Klunk; Henry Engler; Agneta Nordberg; Yanming Wang; Gunnar Blomqvist; Daniel P Holt; Mats Bergström; Irina Savitcheva; Guo-feng Huang; Sergio Estrada; Birgitta Ausén; Manik L Debnath; Julien Barletta; Julie C Price; Johan Sandell; Brian J Lopresti; Anders Wall; Pernilla Koivisto; Gunnar Antoni; Chester A Mathis; Bengt Långström Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Andrei G Vlassenko; Mark A Mintun; Chengjie Xiong; Yvette I Sheline; Alison M Goate; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Lisa Mosconi; Juha O Rinne; Wai H Tsui; John Murray; Yi Li; Lidia Glodzik; Pauline McHugh; Schantel Williams; Megan Cummings; Elizabeth Pirraglia; Stanley J Goldsmith; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Noora Scheinin; Tapio Viljanen; Kjell Någren; Mony J de Leon Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Victor L Villemagne; Kerryn E Pike; Gaël Chételat; Kathryn A Ellis; Rachel S Mulligan; Pierrick Bourgeat; Uwe Ackermann; Gareth Jones; Cassandra Szoeke; Olivier Salvado; Ralph Martins; Graeme O'Keefe; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Brian J Lopresti; Elizabeth M Campbell; Zheming Yu; Stewart J Anderson; Ann D Cohen; Davneet S Minhas; Beth E Snitz; Sarah K Royse; Carl R Becker; Howard J Aizenstein; Chester A Mathis; Oscar L Lopez; William E Klunk; Dana L Tudorascu Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Katherine L Youmans; Leon M Tai; Evelyn Nwabuisi-Heath; Lisa Jungbauer; Takahisa Kanekiyo; Ming Gan; Jungsu Kim; William A Eimer; Steve Estus; G William Rebeck; Edwin J Weeber; Guojun Bu; Chunjiang Yu; Mary Jo Ladu Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 5.157