PURPOSE: To test the gamma-H2AX (Histone 2AX phosphorylation of serine 139) foci assay for the detection of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage in buccal exfoliated cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Buccal mucosa cells from five individuals (three females, two males, aged 26-47 years) were exposed to 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 Gy of gamma-rays. DNA damage and DNA damage removal were measured using the gamma-H2AX foci assay. Lymphocytes from one donor and the nuclear antigen H2B were used as a positive control to test the staining protocol. RESULTS: In the absence of radiation exposure, no significant differences for both H2B and gamma-H2AX signals were detected when comparing buccal cells and lymphocytes. The gamma-H2AX foci rate per cell in non-irradiated buccal cells was 0.08 +/- 0.02. The number of gamma-H2AX foci increased linearly with ionising radiation dose in the interval from 0-4 Gy, and reached a foci rate per cell of 0.82 +/- 0.22 at 4 Gy. Incubation experiments after in vitro gamma irradiation revealed that the number of gamma-H2AX foci did not show a significant decrease 5 h post exposure under the experimental conditions used. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that it is possible to apply the gamma-H2AX foci assay for the detection of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage in buccal exfoliated cells. The low removal of ionising radiation induced gamma-H2AX foci in buccal cells is a potential advantage for a biological dosimetry application.
PURPOSE: To test the gamma-H2AX (Histone 2AX phosphorylation of serine 139) foci assay for the detection of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage in buccal exfoliated cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Buccal mucosa cells from five individuals (three females, two males, aged 26-47 years) were exposed to 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 Gy of gamma-rays. DNA damage and DNA damage removal were measured using the gamma-H2AX foci assay. Lymphocytes from one donor and the nuclear antigen H2B were used as a positive control to test the staining protocol. RESULTS: In the absence of radiation exposure, no significant differences for both H2B and gamma-H2AX signals were detected when comparing buccal cells and lymphocytes. The gamma-H2AX foci rate per cell in non-irradiated buccal cells was 0.08 +/- 0.02. The number of gamma-H2AX foci increased linearly with ionising radiation dose in the interval from 0-4 Gy, and reached a foci rate per cell of 0.82 +/- 0.22 at 4 Gy. Incubation experiments after in vitro gamma irradiation revealed that the number of gamma-H2AX foci did not show a significant decrease 5 h post exposure under the experimental conditions used. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that it is possible to apply the gamma-H2AX foci assay for the detection of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage in buccal exfoliated cells. The low removal of ionising radiation induced gamma-H2AX foci in buccal cells is a potential advantage for a biological dosimetry application.
Authors: Christophe E Redon; Urbain Weyemi; Palak R Parekh; Dejun Huang; Allison S Burrell; William M Bonner Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2012-03-09
Authors: Alesia Ivashkevich; Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Roger F Martin; Olga A Martin Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Li-Jeen Mah; Christian Orlowski; Katherine Ververis; Raja S Vasireddy; Assam El-Osta; Tom C Karagiannis Journal: Genome Integr Date: 2011-01-25