Literature DB >> 20597672

Treatment guidelines and outcomes of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Antoni Torres1, Miquel Ferrer, Joan Ramón Badia.   

Abstract

Hospital-acquired pneumonia is the second most frequent nosocomial infection and the first in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cost. In recent years, international societies and, most recently, the American Thoracic Society jointly with the Infectious Disease Society of America, have developed guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia, health care-associated pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. These guidelines include recommendations for risk stratification, initial and definitive antibiotic treatment, and prevention. The validation of these guidelines is important because it confirms that they can be used in clinical practice, as quality indicators, and as a standard of care. Several processes can be validated and are included in the guidelines, such as the accuracy of the prediction of microorganisms according to stratification criteria and the impact of guidelines on outcomes, including length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, complications, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Clinical studies have shown that the accuracy of predicting microorganisms according to risk stratification is reliable ( approximately 80% and approximately 90%). Three studies suggest that the implementation of guidelines, with a special emphasis on antibiotic treatment, improves several parameters of outcome. Only one study, using a before-and-after design, showed a decrease in 14-day mortality after guidelines implementation. A key issue for these studies is to modify recommendations according to local patterns of microbiology and drug resistance. In summary, implementation of guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia decreases the rate of initial inappropriate antibiotic treatment and decreased 14-day mortality in a study. More clinical studies to validate the influence of guidelines on outcome are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20597672     DOI: 10.1086/653049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  37 in total

Review 1.  [Severe community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia].

Authors:  L Witte; D Drömann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  Brain-lung crosstalk: Implications for neurocritical care patients.

Authors:  Ségolène Mrozek; Jean-Michel Constantin; Thomas Geeraerts
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-08-04

Review 3.  Are we ready for novel detection methods to treat respiratory pathogens in hospital-acquired pneumonia?

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Kristine M Hujer; Andrea M Hujer; Sebastian Kurz; Michael R Jacobs; David S Perlin; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Audit and Feedback-Focused approach to Evidence-based Care in Treating patients with pneumonia in hospital (AFFECT Study).

Authors:  Katelyn Halpape; Linda Sulz; Brenda Schuster; Ron Taylor
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-01

Review 5.  Recommended design features of future clinical trials of antibacterial agents for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  Brad Spellberg; George Talbot
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Corticosteroids for pneumonia.

Authors:  Anat Stern; Keren Skalsky; Tomer Avni; Elena Carrara; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  Dose-response relationship between exercise and respiratory disease mortality.

Authors:  Paul T Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in lower respiratory tract secretions from patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia: evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA SSTI assay.

Authors:  Emilia Cercenado; Mercedes Marín; Almudena Burillo; Pablo Martín-Rabadán; Marisa Rivera; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Ceftobiprole activity against over 60,000 clinical bacterial pathogens isolated in Europe, Turkey, and Israel from 2005 to 2010.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Robert K Flamm; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samir S Awad; Alejandro H Rodriguez; Yin-Ching Chuang; Zsuszanna Marjanek; Alex J Pareigis; Gilmar Reis; Thomas W L Scheeren; Alejandro S Sánchez; Xin Zhou; Mikaël Saulay; Marc Engelhardt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.