PURPOSE: In previous reports, laboratory-made lysolecithin-containing thermosensitive liposome encapsulating doxorubicin (LTSL-DOX) showed potent anticancer effects in FaDu human squamous cell carcinoma. To further study the spectrum of LTSL-DOX activity, the efficacy of its commercial formulation was re-examined in FaDu and compared in HCT116, PC3, SKOV-3 and 4T07 cancer cell lines. Factors that may influence differences in HT-LTSL-DOX efficacy were also examined. METHODS: Anticancer effect was measured using standard growth delay methods. We measured doubling time and clonogenic survival after doxorubicin exposure in vitro, and interstitial pH and drug concentrations in vivo. RESULTS: In all five tumour types, HT-LTSL-DOX increased median tumour growth time compared with untreated controls (p < 0.0006) and HT alone (p < 0.01), and compared with LTSL-DOX alone in FaDu, PC-3 and HCT-116 (p < 0.0006). HT-LTSL-DOX yielded significantly higher drug concentrations than LTSL-DOX (p < 0.0001). FaDu was most sensitive (p < 0.0014) to doxorubicin (IC(50) = 90 nM) in vitro, compared to the other cell lines (IC(50) = 129-168 nM). Of the parameters tested for correlation with efficacy, only the correlation of in vitro doubling time and in vivo median growth time was significant (Pearson r = 0.98, p = 0.0035). Slower-growing SKOV-3 and PC-3 had the greatest numbers of complete regressions and longest tumour growth delays, which are clinically important parameters. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest that variations in anti-tumour effect of HT-LTSL-DOX are primarily related to in vitro doubling time. In the clinic, the rate of tumour progression must be considered in design of treatment regimens involving HT-LTSL-DOX.
PURPOSE: In previous reports, laboratory-made lysolecithin-containing thermosensitive liposome encapsulating doxorubicin (LTSL-DOX) showed potent anticancer effects in FaDuhumansquamous cell carcinoma. To further study the spectrum of LTSL-DOX activity, the efficacy of its commercial formulation was re-examined in FaDu and compared in HCT116, PC3, SKOV-3 and 4T07 cancer cell lines. Factors that may influence differences in HT-LTSL-DOX efficacy were also examined. METHODS: Anticancer effect was measured using standard growth delay methods. We measured doubling time and clonogenic survival after doxorubicin exposure in vitro, and interstitial pH and drug concentrations in vivo. RESULTS: In all five tumour types, HT-LTSL-DOX increased median tumour growth time compared with untreated controls (p < 0.0006) and HT alone (p < 0.01), and compared with LTSL-DOX alone in FaDu, PC-3 and HCT-116 (p < 0.0006). HT-LTSL-DOX yielded significantly higher drug concentrations than LTSL-DOX (p < 0.0001). FaDu was most sensitive (p < 0.0014) to doxorubicin (IC(50) = 90 nM) in vitro, compared to the other cell lines (IC(50) = 129-168 nM). Of the parameters tested for correlation with efficacy, only the correlation of in vitro doubling time and in vivo median growth time was significant (Pearson r = 0.98, p = 0.0035). Slower-growing SKOV-3 and PC-3 had the greatest numbers of complete regressions and longest tumour growth delays, which are clinically important parameters. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest that variations in anti-tumour effect of HT-LTSL-DOX are primarily related to in vitro doubling time. In the clinic, the rate of tumour progression must be considered in design of treatment regimens involving HT-LTSL-DOX.
Authors: T D Madden; P R Harrigan; L C Tai; M B Bally; L D Mayer; T E Redelmeier; H C Loughrey; C P Tilcock; L W Reinish; P R Cullis Journal: Chem Phys Lipids Date: 1990-03 Impact factor: 3.329
Authors: A M Fry; C M Chresta; S M Davies; M C Walker; A L Harris; J A Hartley; J R Masters; I D Hickson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1991-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: D M Prescott; H C Charles; H D Sostman; R L Page; D E Thrall; D Moore; J R Oleson; M W Dewhirst Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 1993 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Azadeh Kheirolomoom; Chun-Yen Lai; Sarah M Tam; Lisa M Mahakian; Elizabeth S Ingham; Katherine D Watson; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: J Control Release Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Jim Zhong; Narasimhan Rajaram; David M Brizel; Amy E Frees; Nirmala Ramanujam; Ines Batinic-Haberle; Mark W Dewhirst Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Ari Partanen; Pavel S Yarmolenko; Antti Viitala; Sunil Appanaboyina; Dieter Haemmerich; Ashish Ranjan; Genevieve Jacobs; David Woods; Julia Enholm; Bradford J Wood; Matthew R Dreher Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Andrew S Mikhail; Ari Partanen; Pavel Yarmolenko; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Bradford J Wood Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 2.266