PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that deletions of varying sizes in de novo apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements are a significant cause of phenotypic abnormalities. METHODS: A total of fifteen patients, with seemingly balanced de novo rearrangements by routine cytogenetic analysis but with phenotypic anomalies, were systematically analyzed. We characterized the breakpoints in these fifteen cases (two of which were ascertained prenatally), using a combination of high-resolution GTG-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), and data from the Human Genome Project. RESULTS: Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the 15 patients revealed nine with deletions, ranging in size from 0.8 to 15.3 Mb, with the number of genes lost ranging from 15 to 70. In five of the other six cases, a known or putative gene(s) was potentially disrupted as a result of the chromosomal rearrangement. In the remaining case, no deletions were detected, and no known genes were apparently disrupted. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of molecular cytogenetic techniques is a highly effective way of systematically delineating chromosomal breakpoints, and that the presence of deletions of varying size is an important cause of phenotypic abnormalities in patients with "balanced" de novo rearrangements.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that deletions of varying sizes in de novo apparently balanced chromosome rearrangements are a significant cause of phenotypic abnormalities. METHODS: A total of fifteen patients, with seemingly balanced de novo rearrangements by routine cytogenetic analysis but with phenotypic anomalies, were systematically analyzed. We characterized the breakpoints in these fifteen cases (two of which were ascertained prenatally), using a combination of high-resolution GTG-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), and data from the Human Genome Project. RESULTS: Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the 15 patients revealed nine with deletions, ranging in size from 0.8 to 15.3 Mb, with the number of genes lost ranging from 15 to 70. In five of the other six cases, a known or putative gene(s) was potentially disrupted as a result of the chromosomal rearrangement. In the remaining case, no deletions were detected, and no known genes were apparently disrupted. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of molecular cytogenetic techniques is a highly effective way of systematically delineating chromosomal breakpoints, and that the presence of deletions of varying size is an important cause of phenotypic abnormalities in patients with "balanced" de novo rearrangements.
Authors: Caroline Astbury; Laurie A Christ; David J Aughton; Suzanne B Cassidy; Atsuko Fujimoto; Beth A Pletcher; Irwin A Schafer; Stuart Schwartz Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2004-02-07 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: S M Gribble; E Prigmore; D C Burford; K M Porter; Bee Ling Ng; E J Douglas; H Fiegler; P Carr; D Kalaitzopoulos; S Clegg; R Sandstrom; I K Temple; S A Youings; N S Thomas; N R Dennis; P A Jacobs; J A Crolla; N P Carter Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Julia Baptista; Catherine Mercer; Elena Prigmore; Susan M Gribble; Nigel P Carter; Viv Maloney; N Simon Thomas; Patricia A Jacobs; John A Crolla Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Katarzyna Borg; Paweł Stankiewicz; Ewa Bocian; Anna Kruczek; Ewa Obersztyn; James R Lupski; Tadeusz Mazurczak Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Kerry K Brown; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Michael Matos; Richard L Robertson; Virginia E Kimonis; Cynthia C Morton Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: J A Fantes; E Boland; J Ramsay; D Donnai; M Splitt; J A Goodship; H Stewart; M Whiteford; P Gautier; L Harewood; S Holloway; F Sharkey; E Maher; V van Heyningen; J Clayton-Smith; D R Fitzpatrick; G C M Black Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Anne W Higgins; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Amy F Bosco; Kerry K Brown; Gail A P Bruns; Diana J Donovan; Robert Eisenman; Yanli Fan; Chantal G Farra; Heather L Ferguson; James F Gusella; David J Harris; Steven R Herrick; Chantal Kelly; Hyung-Goo Kim; Shotaro Kishikawa; Bruce R Korf; Shashikant Kulkarni; Eric Lally; Natalia T Leach; Emma Lemyre; Janine Lewis; Azra H Ligon; Weining Lu; Richard L Maas; Marcy E MacDonald; Steven D P Moore; Roxanna E Peters; Bradley J Quade; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Irfan Saadi; Yiping Shen; Jay Shendure; Robin E Williamson; Cynthia C Morton Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 11.025