Literature DB >> 20595544

Fibular collateral ligament anatomical reconstructions: a prospective outcomes study.

Robert F LaPrade1, Stanislav I Spiridonov, Benjamin R Coobs, Paul R Ruckert, Chad J Griffith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After the development and biomechanical validation of an anatomical fibular collateral ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus graft, this technique has subsequently been applied clinically. HYPOTHESIS: An anatomical reconstruction of a grade III fibular collateral ligament tear using a semitendinosus graft restores the knee to near-normal lateral compartment stability and results in improved patient outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A prospective study of 20 patients with an average age of 24 years (range, 16-45 years) who had an anatomical reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament using a semitendinosus graft was performed. All patients were preoperatively and postoperatively evaluated with the modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scoring systems, with the IKDC objective subscores for lateral and posterolateral knee stability and with varus stress radiographs. The patients were followed for an average of 2 years.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients were available for follow-up. Six of the patients had an isolated fibular collateral ligament reconstruction. The average preoperative modified Cincinnati score was 28.2, and the average IKDC subjective score was 34.7. Postoperatively, there was a significant improvement of both the modified Cincinnati score (to 88.5) and the IKDC subjective outcome score (to 88.1). The Cincinnati component symptom and functional subscores were also evaluated. The average preoperative symptom subscore was 9.1 and the functional subscore was 19.1. Postoperatively, there was a significant improvement in both scores; symptom subscores improved to 43.0 and functional subscores improved to 45.5. Preoperative varus stress radiographs demonstrated an average differential of 3.9 mm (range, 2.5-6.2 mm) of lateral compartment gapping between the injured and noninjured knee. At an average of 2 years postoperatively, varus stress radiographs demonstrated an average side-to-side lateral compartment gap differential of -0.4 mm.
CONCLUSION: An anatomical fibular collateral ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus graft results in improved patient outcomes and near-normal lateral compartment stability in patients with grade III injuries of the fibular collateral ligament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595544     DOI: 10.1177/0363546510370200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

Review 1.  Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Samuel G Moulton; Marco Nitri; Werner Mueller; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Quantitative radiographic assessment of the anatomic attachment sites of the anterior and posterior complexes of the proximal tibiofibular joint.

Authors:  Daniel Cole Marchetti; Jorge Chahla; Gilbert Moatshe; Erik L Slette; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A physeal-sparing fibular collateral ligament and proximal tibiofibular joint reconstruction in a skeletally immature athlete.

Authors:  Brady T Williams; Evan W James; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Part I: An anatomic-based tunnel in the fibular head for posterolateral corner reconstruction using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kyle C Bohm; Robby S Sikka; Joel L Boyd; Bret Yonke; Marc Tompkins
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anatomic Fibular Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gilbert Moatshe; Chase S Dean; Jorge Chahla; Raphael Serra Cruz; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 6.  ACL and Posterolateral Corner Injuries.

Authors:  Robert S Dean; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

7.  Rotational profile alterations after anatomic posterolateral corner reconstructions in multiligament injured knees.

Authors:  Nicolas Tardy; Caroline Mouton; Philippe Boisrenoult; Daniel Theisen; Philippe Beaufils; Romain Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anterolateral ligament anatomy: a comparative anatomical study.

Authors:  Sheila Jean McNeill Ingham; Rogerio Teixeira de Carvalho; Cesar A Q Martins; Pisit Lertwanich; Rene Jorge Abdalla; Patrick Smolinski; C Owen Lovejoy; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Can stress radiography of the knee help characterize posterolateral corner injury?

Authors:  F Winston Gwathmey; Marc A Tompkins; Cree M Gaskin; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction Versus Repair.

Authors:  Mark McCarthy; T J Ridley; Matthew Bollier; Shane Cook; Brian Wolf; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.