PURPOSE: Currently, there are no studies that clearly define a method for the placement of the fibular tunnel between the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) insertions when performing an anatomic-based posterolateral corner reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to use magnetic resonance-based anatomic landmarks to describe the orientation of a fibular tunnel between the FCL and PFL insertions. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 105 patients with normal posterolateral corner knee anatomy was identified by a musculoskeletal radiologist, and the FCL and popliteofibular insertions were labelled. Three experienced providers independently evaluated the images. In the axial plane, the Cobb angle of a fibular tunnel from the FCL to the popliteofibular insertion was measured using the tibial tubercle as a reference. In the sagittal plane, the same tunnel was measured in reference to the lateral tibial plateau. RESULTS: In the axial plane, the average Cobb angle for an anatomic-based fibular tunnel was 48.1° ± 10.7° (ICC(2,1) = 0.76, p < 0.01) externally rotated to the tibial tubercle. In the sagittal plane, the average Cobb angle for an anatomic-based fibular tunnel was 59.8° ± 11.9° (ICC(2,1) = 0.81, p < 0.01) cranial, referenced from the lateral tibial plateau. The average length of the fibular tunnel was 2.0 ± 0.4 cm (ICC(2,1) = 0.78, p < 0.01), at the point of the fibular insertion. The distance from the midpoint of the fibular tunnel to the posterolateral wall of the fibular head was 0.8 ± 0.2 cm (ICC(2,1) = 0.63, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MRI can be used to identify the orientation between the FCL and PFL insertions to create an anatomic-based fibular tunnel, which is 50° externally rotated from the tibial tubercle in the axial plane and placed in a cranial direction of 60° relative to the lateral joint line. The clinical relevance of this study is that this information may aid surgeons in placing a fibular tunnel connecting the FCL and PFL insertions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PURPOSE: Currently, there are no studies that clearly define a method for the placement of the fibular tunnel between the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) insertions when performing an anatomic-based posterolateral corner reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to use magnetic resonance-based anatomic landmarks to describe the orientation of a fibular tunnel between the FCL and PFL insertions. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 105 patients with normal posterolateral corner knee anatomy was identified by a musculoskeletal radiologist, and the FCL and popliteofibular insertions were labelled. Three experienced providers independently evaluated the images. In the axial plane, the Cobb angle of a fibular tunnel from the FCL to the popliteofibular insertion was measured using the tibial tubercle as a reference. In the sagittal plane, the same tunnel was measured in reference to the lateral tibial plateau. RESULTS: In the axial plane, the average Cobb angle for an anatomic-based fibular tunnel was 48.1° ± 10.7° (ICC(2,1) = 0.76, p < 0.01) externally rotated to the tibial tubercle. In the sagittal plane, the average Cobb angle for an anatomic-based fibular tunnel was 59.8° ± 11.9° (ICC(2,1) = 0.81, p < 0.01) cranial, referenced from the lateral tibial plateau. The average length of the fibular tunnel was 2.0 ± 0.4 cm (ICC(2,1) = 0.78, p < 0.01), at the point of the fibular insertion. The distance from the midpoint of the fibular tunnel to the posterolateral wall of the fibular head was 0.8 ± 0.2 cm (ICC(2,1) = 0.63, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MRI can be used to identify the orientation between the FCL and PFL insertions to create an anatomic-based fibular tunnel, which is 50° externally rotated from the tibial tubercle in the axial plane and placed in a cranial direction of 60° relative to the lateral joint line. The clinical relevance of this study is that this information may aid surgeons in placing a fibular tunnel connecting the FCL and PFL insertions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Authors: Muhammad Munshi; Michael L Pretterklieber; Sandy Kwak; Gregory E Antonio; Debra J Trudell; Donald Resnick Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Robert F LaPrade; Steinar Johansen; Fred A Wentorf; Lars Engebretsen; Justin L Esterberg; Andy Tso Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004-07-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Robert F LaPrade; Steinar Johansen; Julie Agel; May Arna Risberg; Havard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Samuel G Moulton; Lauren M Matheny; Evan W James; Robert F LaPrade Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Leonardo Adeo Ramos; Tiago Zogbi; Edilson Ferreira de Andrade; Gabriel Taniguti de Oliveira; Alexandre Pedro Nicolini; Joseph J Krob; Jorge Yamashita; Moises Cohen; Diego Costa Astur Journal: J Orthop Date: 2019-05-27