Literature DB >> 20595542

Comparison between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation for muscle and systemic acute responses.

Abdulaziz Aldayel1, Marc Jubeau, Michael McGuigan, Kazunori Nosaka.   

Abstract

This study compared alternating current and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) for torque output, skin temperature (Tsk), blood lactate and hormonal responses, and skeletal muscle damage markers. Twelve healthy men (23-48 yr) received alternating current EMS (2.5 kHz delivered at 75 Hz, 400 micros) for the knee extensors of one leg and pulsed current (75 Hz, 400 micros) for the other leg to induce 40 isometric contractions (on-off ratio 5-15 s) at the knee joint angle of 100 degrees (0 degrees: full extension). The use of the legs for each condition was counterbalanced among subjects, and the two EMS bouts were separated by 2 wk. The current amplitude was consistently increased to maximally tolerable level, and the torque and perceived intensity were recorded over 40 isometric contractions. Tsk of the stimulated and contralateral knee extensors were measured before, during, and for 30 min after EMS. Blood lactate, growth hormone, testosterone, insulin-like growth factor 1, testosterone, and cortisol were measured before, during, and for 45 min following EMS. Muscle damage markers included maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque, muscle soreness with a 100-mm visual analog scale, and plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity, which were measured before and 1, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after EMS. No significant differences in the torque induced during stimulation (approximately 30% maximal voluntary isometric contraction) and perceived intensity were found, and changes in Tsk, blood lactate, and hormones were not significantly different between conditions. However, all of the measures showed significant (P<0.05) changes from baseline values. Skeletal muscle damage was evidenced by prolonged strength loss, development of muscle soreness, and increases in plasma CK activity; however, the changes in the variables were not significantly different between conditions. It is concluded that acute effects of alternating and pulsed current EMS on the stimulated muscles are similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595542     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00189.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  12 in total

Review 1.  Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Kazunori Nosaka; Abdulaziz Aldayel; Marc Jubeau; Trevor C Chen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Chronic effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on aerobic and anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  Sebastian Mathes; Niklas Lehnen; Tobias Link; Wilhelm Bloch; Joachim Mester; Patrick Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Alteration of muscle function after electrical stimulation bout of knee extensors and flexors.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Mylène Triffaux; Christophe Demoulin; Jean-Michel Crielaard; Jean-Louis Croisier
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  The effects of physical therapeutic agents on serum levels of stress hormones in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Şükrü Burak Tönük; Erdinc Serin; Fikriye Figen Ayhan; Zeynep Rezan Yorgancioglu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Acute effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on myokines and markers of muscle damage.

Authors:  P Wahl; M Hein; S Achtzehn; W Bloch; J Mester
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Effect of tendon vibration during wide-pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the decline and recovery of muscle force.

Authors:  Vanesa Bochkezanian; Robert U Newton; Gabriel S Trajano; Amilton Vieira; Timothy S Pulverenti; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 8.  Comparison of the effects of kilohertz- and low-frequency electric stimulations: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hirotaka Iijima; Masaki Takahashi; Yuto Tashiro; Tomoki Aoyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Time course of central and peripheral alterations after isometric neuromuscular electrical stimulation-induced muscle damage.

Authors:  Alexandre Fouré; Kazunori Nosaka; Jennifer Wegrzyk; Guillaume Duhamel; Arnaud Le Troter; Hélène Boudinet; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Christophe Vilmen; Marc Jubeau; David Bendahan; Julien Gondin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Acute metabolic, hormonal, and psychological responses to strength training with superimposed EMS at the beginning and the end of a 6 week training period.

Authors:  N Wirtz; P Wahl; H Kleinöder; K Wechsler; S Achtzehn; J Mester
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.