BACKGROUND: Abnormal connectivity of the anticorrelated intrinsic networks, the task-negative network (TNN), and the task-positive network (TPN) is implicated in schizophrenia. Comparisons between schizophrenic patients and their unaffected siblings enable further understanding of illness susceptibility and pathophysiology. We examined the resting-state connectivity differences in the intrinsic networks between schizophrenic patients, their unaffected siblings, and healthy controls. METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance images were obtained from 25 individuals in each subject group. The posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were used as seed regions to identify the TNN and TPN through functional connectivity analysis. Interregional connectivity strengths were analyzed using overlapped intrinsic networks composed of regions common to all subject groups. RESULTS: Schizophrenic patients and their unaffected siblings showed increased connectivity in the TNN between the bilateral inferior temporal gyri. By contrast, schizophrenic patients alone demonstrated increased connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and left inferior temporal gyrus and between the ventral medial prefrontal cortex and right lateral parietal cortex in the TNN. Schizophrenic patients exhibited increased connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right inferior frontal gyrus in the TPN relative to their unaffected siblings, though this trend only approached statistical significance in comparison to healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Resting-state hyperconnectivity of the intrinsic networks may disrupt network coordination and thereby contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Similar, though milder, hyperconnectivity of the TNN in unaffected siblings of schizophrenic patients may contribute to the identification of schizophrenia endophenotypes and ultimately to the determination of schizophrenia risk genes.
BACKGROUND: Abnormal connectivity of the anticorrelated intrinsic networks, the task-negative network (TNN), and the task-positive network (TPN) is implicated in schizophrenia. Comparisons between schizophrenicpatients and their unaffected siblings enable further understanding of illness susceptibility and pathophysiology. We examined the resting-state connectivity differences in the intrinsic networks between schizophrenicpatients, their unaffected siblings, and healthy controls. METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance images were obtained from 25 individuals in each subject group. The posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were used as seed regions to identify the TNN and TPN through functional connectivity analysis. Interregional connectivity strengths were analyzed using overlapped intrinsic networks composed of regions common to all subject groups. RESULTS:Schizophrenicpatients and their unaffected siblings showed increased connectivity in the TNN between the bilateral inferior temporal gyri. By contrast, schizophrenicpatients alone demonstrated increased connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and left inferior temporal gyrus and between the ventral medial prefrontal cortex and right lateral parietal cortex in the TNN. Schizophrenicpatients exhibited increased connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right inferior frontal gyrus in the TPN relative to their unaffected siblings, though this trend only approached statistical significance in comparison to healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Resting-state hyperconnectivity of the intrinsic networks may disrupt network coordination and thereby contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Similar, though milder, hyperconnectivity of the TNN in unaffected siblings of schizophrenicpatients may contribute to the identification of schizophrenia endophenotypes and ultimately to the determination of schizophrenia risk genes.
Authors: Elizabeth R Sowell; Eric Kan; June Yoshii; Paul M Thompson; Ravi Bansal; Dongrong Xu; Arthur W Toga; Bradley S Peterson Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2008-05-18 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Toshiaki Onitsuka; Martha E Shenton; Dean F Salisbury; Chandlee C Dickey; Kiyoto Kasai; Sarah K Toner; Melissa Frumin; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert W McCarley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Margriet M Sitskoorn; André Aleman; Sjoerd J H Ebisch; Melanie C M Appels; René S Kahn Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Rebecca E Watsky; Stephen J Gotts; Rebecca A Berman; Harrison M McAdams; Xueping Zhou; Dede Greenstein; Francois M Lalonde; Peter Gochman; Liv S Clasen; Lorie Shora; Anna E Ordóñez; Nitin Gogtay; Alex Martin; Deanna M Barch; Judith L Rapoport; Siyuan Liu Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 4.939