Literature DB >> 20590279

The effect of target strain error on plantar tissue stress.

Shruti Pai1, William R Ledoux.   

Abstract

Accurate quantification of soft tissue properties, specifically the stress relaxation behavior of viscoelastic tissues such as plantar tissue, requires precise testing under physiologically relevant loading. However, limitations of testing equipment often result in target strain errors that can contribute to large stress errors and confound comparative results to an unknown extent. Previous investigations have modeled this artifact, but they have been unable to obtain empirical data to validate their models. Moreover, there are no studies that address this issue for plantar tissue. The purpose of this research was to directly measure the difference in peak force for a series of small target strain errors within the range of our typical stress relaxation experiments for the subcutaneous plantar soft tissue. Five plantar tissue specimens were tested to seven incremental target strain error levels of -0.9%, -0.6%, -0.3%, 0.0%, 0.3%, 0.6%, and 0.9%, so as to undershoot and overshoot the target displacement in 0.3% increments. The imposed strain errors were accurately attained using a special compensation feature of our materials testing software that can drive the actuator to within 0% (1-2 microm) of the target level for cyclic tests. Since stress relaxation tests are not cyclic, we emulated the ramp portion of our stress relaxation tests with 5 Hz triangle waves. The average total stress variation for all specimens was 25+/-5%, with the highest and lowest stresses corresponding to the largest and smallest strain errors of 0.9% and -0.9%, respectively. A strain overshoot of 0.3%, the target strain error observed in our typical stress relaxation experiments, corresponded to an average stress overshoot of 3+/-1%. Plantar tissue in compression is sensitive to small target strain errors that can result in stress errors that are several fold larger. The extent to which the overshoot may affect the peak stress will likely differ in magnitude for other soft tissues and loading modes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20590279      PMCID: PMC3335172          DOI: 10.1115/1.4001398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  11 in total

1.  Linear and quasi-linear viscoelastic characterization of ankle ligaments.

Authors:  J R Funk; G W Hall; J R Crandall; W D Pilkey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet.

Authors:  William R Ledoux; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Material properties of the human calcaneal fat pad in compression: experiment and theory.

Authors:  Janice E Miller-Young; Neil A Duncan; Gamal Baroud
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  An improved method to analyze the stress relaxation of ligaments following a finite ramp time based on the quasi-linear viscoelastic theory.

Authors:  Steven D Abramowitch; Savio L Woo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  The effect of overshooting the target strain on estimating viscoelastic properties from stress relaxation experiments.

Authors:  Jonathan A Gimbel; Joseph J Sarver; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  The compressive material properties of the plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  William R Ledoux; Joanna J Blevins
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The effects of preconditioning strain on measured tissue properties.

Authors:  Shaokoon Cheng; Elizabeth C Clarke; Lynne E Bilston
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  On the viscoelastic properties of the anteromedial bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  M K Kwan; T H Lin; S L Woo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Parameter estimation using the quasi-linear viscoelastic model proposed by Fung.

Authors:  L J Dortmans; A A Sauren; E P Rousseau
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 10.  A review of the biomechanics of the diabetic foot.

Authors:  C H M van Schie
Journal:  Int J Low Extrem Wounds       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.057

View more
  4 in total

1.  A mathematical method for quantifying in vivo mechanical behaviour of heel pad under dynamic load.

Authors:  Roozbeh Naemi; Panagiotis E Chatzistergos; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The compressive mechanical properties of diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  Shruti Pai; William R Ledoux
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The quasi-linear viscoelastic properties of diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  Shruti Pai; William R Ledoux
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The association between mechanical and biochemical/histological characteristics in diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  William R Ledoux; Shruti Pai; Jane B Shofer; Yak-Nam Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.712

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.