Literature DB >> 20589671

In situ effective diffusion coefficient profiles in live biofilms using pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance.

Ryan S Renslow1, Paul D Majors, Jeffrey S McLean, Jim K Fredrickson, Bulbul Ahmed, Haluk Beyenal.   

Abstract

Diffusive mass transfer in biofilms is characterized by the effective diffusion coefficient. It is well documented that the effective diffusion coefficient can vary by location in a biofilm. The current literature is dominated by effective diffusion coefficient measurements for distinct cell clusters and stratified biofilms showing this spatial variation. Regardless of whether distinct cell clusters or surface-averaging methods are used, position-dependent measurements of the effective diffusion coefficient are currently: (1) invasive to the biofilm, (2) performed under unnatural conditions, (3) lethal to cells, and/or (4) spatially restricted to only certain regions of the biofilm. Invasive measurements can lead to inaccurate results and prohibit further (time-dependent) measurements which are important for the mathematical modeling of biofilms. In this study our goals were to: (1) measure the effective diffusion coefficient for water in live biofilms, (2) monitor how the effective diffusion coefficient changes over time under growth conditions, and (3) correlate the effective diffusion coefficient with depth in the biofilm. We measured in situ two-dimensional effective diffusion coefficient maps within Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms using pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance methods, and used them to calculate surface-averaged relative effective diffusion coefficient (D(rs)) profiles. We found that (1) D(rs) decreased from the top of the biofilm to the bottom, (2) D(rs) profiles differed for biofilms of different ages, (3) D(rs) profiles changed over time and generally decreased with time, (4) all the biofilms showed very similar D(rs) profiles near the top of the biofilm, and (5) the D(rs) profile near the bottom of the biofilm was different for each biofilm. Practically, our results demonstrate that advanced biofilm models should use a variable effective diffusivity which changes with time and location in the biofilm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20589671      PMCID: PMC2898744          DOI: 10.1002/bit.22755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  26 in total

1.  Diffusion coefficients of metabolites in active biofilms.

Authors:  E E Beuling; J C van Den Heuvel; S P Ottengraf
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effect of diffusive and convective substrate transport on biofilm structure formation: a two-dimensional modeling study.

Authors:  C Picioreanu; M C Van Loosdrecht; J J Heijnen
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Determination of diffusion coefficients in biofilms by confocal laser microscopy.

Authors:  J R Lawrence; G M Wolfaardt; D R Korber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Growing oral biofilms in a constant depth film fermentor (CDFF).

Authors:  Jonathan Pratten
Journal:  Curr Protoc Microbiol       Date:  2007-08

5.  Diffusion of phenol through a biofilm grown on activated carbon particles in a draft-tube three-phase fluidized-bed bioreactor.

Authors:  L S Fan; R Leyva-Ramos; K D Wisecarver; B J Zehner
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1990-02-05       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion.

Authors:  D Le Bihan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Determination of pollutant diffusion coefficients in naturally formed biofilms using a single tube extractive membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  S Zhang; A Splendiani; L M dos Santos; A G Livingston
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1998-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Individual-based modelling of biofilms.

Authors:  J U Kreft; C Picioreanu; J W Wimpenny; M C van Loosdrecht
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.777

9.  Measurement of local diffusion coefficients in biofilms by microinjection and confocal microscopy.

Authors:  D de Beer; P Stoodley; Z Lewandowski
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1997-01-20       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Correlated biofilm imaging, transport and metabolism measurements via combined nuclear magnetic resonance and confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McLean; Ositadinma N Ona; Paul D Majors
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  22 in total

1.  Staphylococcus aureus induces hypoxia and cellular damage in porcine dermal explants.

Authors:  Abdul G Lone; Erhan Atci; Ryan Renslow; Haluk Beyenal; Susan Noh; Boel Fransson; Nehal Abu-Lail; Jeong-Jin Park; David R Gang; Douglas R Call
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  A VOLTAMMETRIC FLAVIN MICROELECTRODE FOR USE IN BIOFILMS.

Authors:  Hung Duc Nguyen; Ryan Renslow; Jerome Babauta; Bulbul Ahmed; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 7.460

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of mass transport and structure inside a phototrophic biofilm.

Authors:  Baheerathan Ramanan; William M Holmes; William T Sloan; Vernon R Phoenix
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Modeling biofilms with dual extracellular electron transfer mechanisms.

Authors:  Ryan Renslow; Jerome Babauta; Andrew Kuprat; Jim Schenk; Cornelius Ivory; Jim Fredrickson; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Structural and metabolic responses of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to hyperosmotic and antibiotic stress.

Authors:  Mia M Kiamco; Abdelrhman Mohamed; Patrick N Reardon; Carrie L Marean-Reardon; Wrya M Aframehr; Douglas R Call; Haluk Beyenal; Ryan S Renslow
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  New Technologies for Studying Biofilms.

Authors:  Michael J Franklin; Connie Chang; Tatsuya Akiyama; Brian Bothner
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-08

7.  DIFFUSION IN BIOFILMS RESPIRING ON ELECTRODES.

Authors:  Rs Renslow; Jt Babauta; Pd Majors; H Beyenal
Journal:  Energy Environ Sci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 38.532

8.  Fe(III) reduction and U(VI) immobilization by Paenibacillus sp. strain 300A, isolated from Hanford 300A subsurface sediments.

Authors:  Bulbul Ahmed; Bin Cao; Jeffrey S McLean; Tuba Ica; Alice Dohnalkova; Ozlem Istanbullu; Akin Paksoy; Jim K Fredrickson; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Biofilm shows spatially stratified metabolic responses to contaminant exposure.

Authors:  Bin Cao; Paul D Majors; Bulbul Ahmed; Ryan S Renslow; Crystal P Silvia; Liang Shi; Staffan Kjelleberg; Jim K Fredrickson; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  METABOLIC SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN ELECTRODE-RESPIRING GEOBACTER SULFURREDUCENS BIOFILMS.

Authors:  Rs Renslow; Jt Babauta; A Dohnalkova; Mi Boyanov; Km Kemner; Pd Majors; Jk Fredrickson; H Beyenal
Journal:  Energy Environ Sci       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 38.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.