Literature DB >> 20589633

Consistent refinement of submitted models at CASP using a knowledge-based potential.

Gaurav Chopra1, Nir Kalisman, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

Protein structure refinement is an important but unsolved problem; it must be solved if we are to predict biological function that is very sensitive to structural details. Specifically, critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction (CASP) shows that the accuracy of predictions in the comparative modeling category is often worse than that of the template on which the homology model is based. Here we describe a refinement protocol that is able to consistently refine submitted predictions for all categories at CASP7. The protocol uses direct energy minimization of the knowledge-based potential of mean force that is based on the interaction statistics of 167 atom types (Summa and Levitt, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:3177-3182). Our protocol is thus computationally very efficient; it only takes a few minutes of CPU time to run typical protein models (300 residues). We observe an average structural improvement of 1% in GDT_TS, for predictions that have low and medium homology to known PDB structures (Global Distance Test score or GDT_TS between 50 and 80%). We also observe a marked improvement in the stereochemistry of the models. The level of improvement varies amongst the various participants at CASP, but we see large improvements (>10% increase in GDT_TS) even for models predicted by the best performing groups at CASP7. In addition, our protocol consistently improved the best predicted models in the refinement category at CASP7 and CASP8. These improvements in structure and stereochemistry prove the usefulness of our computationally inexpensive, powerful and automatic refinement protocol. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20589633      PMCID: PMC2911515          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  31 in total

1.  The packing density in proteins: standard radii and volumes.

Authors:  J Tsai; R Taylor; C Chothia; M Gerstein
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Can correct protein models be identified?

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures.

Authors:  Adam Zemla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates.

Authors:  A L Morris; M W MacArthur; E G Hutchinson; J M Thornton
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1992-04

5.  TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

6.  MESHI: a new library of Java classes for molecular modeling.

Authors:  Nir Kalisman; Ami Levi; Tetyana Maximova; Dan Reshef; Sharon Zafriri-Lynn; Yan Gleyzer; Chen Keasar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching.

Authors:  M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-07-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Refinement of protein conformations using a macromolecular energy minimization procedure.

Authors:  M Levitt; S Lifson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1969-12-14       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.

Authors:  A Sali; T L Blundell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

View more
  20 in total

1.  Structure-function analysis of the DNA translocating portal of the bacteriophage T4 packaging machine.

Authors:  Victor Padilla-Sanchez; Song Gao; Hyung Rae Kim; Daisuke Kihara; Lei Sun; Michael G Rossmann; Venigalla B Rao
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Fully differentiable coarse-grained and all-atom knowledge-based potentials for RNA structure evaluation.

Authors:  Julie Bernauer; Xuhui Huang; Adelene Y L Sim; Michael Levitt
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Automated real-space refinement of protein structures using a realistic backbone move set.

Authors:  Esmael J Haddadian; Haipeng Gong; Abhishek K Jha; Xiaojing Yang; Joe Debartolo; James R Hinshaw; Phoebe A Rice; Tobin R Sosnick; Karl F Freed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Minkyung Baek; Woong-Hee Shin; Hwan Won Chung; Chaok Seok
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Computational Refinement and Validation Protocol for Proteins with Large Variable Regions Applied to Model HIV Env Spike in CD4 and 17b Bound State.

Authors:  Muhibur Rasheed; Radhakrishna Bettadapura; Chandrajit Bajaj
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  WeFold: a coopetition for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  George A Khoury; Adam Liwo; Firas Khatib; Hongyi Zhou; Gaurav Chopra; Jaume Bacardit; Leandro O Bortot; Rodrigo A Faccioli; Xin Deng; Yi He; Pawel Krupa; Jilong Li; Magdalena A Mozolewska; Adam K Sieradzan; James Smadbeck; Tomasz Wirecki; Seth Cooper; Jeff Flatten; Kefan Xu; David Baker; Jianlin Cheng; Alexandre C B Delbem; Christodoulos A Floudas; Chen Keasar; Michael Levitt; Zoran Popović; Harold A Scheraga; Jeffrey Skolnick; Silvia N Crivelli
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-07-08

7.  Multiscale modelling of relationships between protein classes and drug behavior across all diseases using the CANDO platform.

Authors:  Geetika Sethi; Gaurav Chopra; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.862

8.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  3Drefine: consistent protein structure refinement by optimizing hydrogen bonding network and atomic-level energy minimization.

Authors:  Debswapna Bhattacharya; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-09-26

10.  Assessment of the model refinement category in CASP12.

Authors:  Ladislav Hovan; Vladimiras Oleinikovas; Havva Yalinca; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Giorgio Saladino; Francesco Luigi Gervasio
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.