UNLABELLED: Following the World Trade Center (WTC) collapse on September 11, 2001, more than 40,000 people were exposed to a complex mixture of inhalable nanoparticles and toxic chemicals. While many developed chronic respiratory symptoms, to what degree olfaction was compromised is unclear. A previous WTC Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program study found that olfactory and nasal trigeminal thresholds were altered by the toxic exposure, but not scores on a 20-odor smell identification test. OBJECTIVES: To employ a well-validated 40-item smell identification test to definitively establish whether the ability to identify odors is compromised in a cohort of WTC-exposed individuals and, if so, whether the degree of compromise is associated with self-reported severity of rhinitic symptoms. METHODS: The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was administered to 99 WTC-exposed persons and 99 matched normal controls. The Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-20) was administered to the 99 WTC-exposed persons and compared to the UPSIT scores. RESULTS: The mean (SD) UPSIT scores were lower in the WTC-exposed group than in age-, sex-, and smoking history-matched controls [respective scores: 30.05 (5.08) vs 35.94 (3.76); p = 0.003], an effect present in a subgroup of 19 subjects additionally matched on occupation (p < 0.001). Fifteen percent of the exposed subjects had severe microsmia, but only 3% anosmia. SNOT-20 scores were unrelated to UPSIT scores (r = 0.20; p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Exposure to WTC air pollution was associated with a decrement in the ability to identify odors, implying that such exposure had a greater influence on smell function than previously realized.
UNLABELLED: Following the World Trade Center (WTC) collapse on September 11, 2001, more than 40,000 people were exposed to a complex mixture of inhalable nanoparticles and toxic chemicals. While many developed chronic respiratory symptoms, to what degree olfaction was compromised is unclear. A previous WTC Medical Monitoring and Treatment Program study found that olfactory and nasal trigeminal thresholds were altered by the toxic exposure, but not scores on a 20-odor smell identification test. OBJECTIVES: To employ a well-validated 40-item smell identification test to definitively establish whether the ability to identify odors is compromised in a cohort of WTC-exposed individuals and, if so, whether the degree of compromise is associated with self-reported severity of rhinitic symptoms. METHODS: The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was administered to 99 WTC-exposed persons and 99 matched normal controls. The Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-20) was administered to the 99 WTC-exposed persons and compared to the UPSIT scores. RESULTS: The mean (SD) UPSIT scores were lower in the WTC-exposed group than in age-, sex-, and smoking history-matched controls [respective scores: 30.05 (5.08) vs 35.94 (3.76); p = 0.003], an effect present in a subgroup of 19 subjects additionally matched on occupation (p < 0.001). Fifteen percent of the exposed subjects had severe microsmia, but only 3% anosmia. SNOT-20 scores were unrelated to UPSIT scores (r = 0.20; p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Exposure to WTC air pollution was associated with a decrement in the ability to identify odors, implying that such exposure had a greater influence on smell function than previously realized.
Authors: Lilian Calderón-Garcidueñas; Maricela Franco-Lira; Carlos Henríquez-Roldán; Norma Osnaya; Angelica González-Maciel; Rafael Reynoso-Robles; Rafael Villarreal-Calderon; Lou Herritt; Diane Brooks; Sheyla Keefe; Juan Palacios-Moreno; Rodolfo Villarreal-Calderon; Ricardo Torres-Jardón; Humberto Medina-Cortina; Ricardo Delgado-Chávez; Mario Aiello-Mora; Robert R Maronpot; Richard L Doty Journal: Exp Toxicol Pathol Date: 2009-03-17
Authors: Robin Herbert; Jacqueline Moline; Gwen Skloot; Kristina Metzger; Sherry Baron; Benjamin Luft; Steven Markowitz; Iris Udasin; Denise Harrison; Diane Stein; Andrew Todd; Paul Enright; Jeanne Mager Stellman; Philip J Landrigan; Stephen M Levin Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Robert Louis Ruff; Ronald George Riechers; Xiao-Feng Wang; Traci Piero; Suzanne Smith Ruff Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 2.692