AIM: To compare the tissue tolerance and efficacy of two wound antiseptics with tissue-tolerable plasma (TTP) on enucleated contaminated eyes from slaughtered pigs in order to draw consequences for the use of TTP on wounds. METHOD: The corneas of extracted eyes were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. One and 10 min after application of 10% povidone (PVP)-iodine and 0.04% polyhexanide, respectively, the eyes were rinsed with inactivating solution. To test TTP, the plasma pen meandered over the eyes at a speed of 30 mm/s and a distance of 5 mm; the eyes were then rinsed with balanced salt solution. The reduction factor was calculated by the difference between the logarithm of colony-forming units in the rinse before and after antisepsis or TTP application. RESULTS: The efficacy of TTP (reduction factor 2.4-2.9) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of PVP-iodine and polyhexanide (reduction factor 1.7-2.1). CONCLUSION: TTP is more effective than the tested wound antiseptics. The lack of histological damage to the eyes of slaughtered pigs would seem to make its use as a wound antiseptic a viable alternative. In contrast to antiseptics, it supplies additional energy in the form of heat, electric fields and radicals by TTP. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
AIM: To compare the tissue tolerance and efficacy of two wound antiseptics with tissue-tolerable plasma (TTP) on enucleated contaminated eyes from slaughtered pigs in order to draw consequences for the use of TTP on wounds. METHOD: The corneas of extracted eyes were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. One and 10 min after application of 10% povidone (PVP)-iodine and 0.04% polyhexanide, respectively, the eyes were rinsed with inactivating solution. To test TTP, the plasma pen meandered over the eyes at a speed of 30 mm/s and a distance of 5 mm; the eyes were then rinsed with balanced salt solution. The reduction factor was calculated by the difference between the logarithm of colony-forming units in the rinse before and after antisepsis or TTP application. RESULTS: The efficacy of TTP (reduction factor 2.4-2.9) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of PVP-iodine and polyhexanide (reduction factor 1.7-2.1). CONCLUSION: TTP is more effective than the tested wound antiseptics. The lack of histological damage to the eyes of slaughtered pigs would seem to make its use as a wound antiseptic a viable alternative. In contrast to antiseptics, it supplies additional energy in the form of heat, electric fields and radicals by TTP. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Philipp Pierdzioch; Stefan Hartwig; Sascha R Herbst; Jan Dirk Raguse; Henrik Dommisch; Shady Abu-Sirhan; Henrik C Wirtz; Moritz Hertel; Sebastian Paris; Saskia Preissner Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Sascha R Herbst; Moritz Hertel; Husam Ballout; Philipp Pierdzioch; Klaus-Dieter Weltmann; Henrik C Wirtz; Shady Abu-Sirhan; Eckehard Kostka; Sebastian Paris; Saskia Preissner Journal: Open Dent J Date: 2015-12-31
Authors: Susanne Gorynia; Ina Koban; Rutger Matthes; Alexander Welk; Sabine Gorynia; Nils-Olaf Hübner; Thomas Kocher; Axel Kramer Journal: GMS Hyg Infect Control Date: 2013-04-29
Authors: Rutger Matthes; Claudia Bender; Rabea Schlüter; Ina Koban; René Bussiahn; Stephan Reuter; Jürgen Lademann; Klaus-Dieter Weltmann; Axel Kramer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 3.240