Literature DB >> 20585962

Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study.

Andre da Luz Moreira1, Isabella Mor, Daniel P Geisler, Feza H Remzi, Ravi P Kiran.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The field of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is expanding. We compare short-term and early oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus open resection in carefully matched rectal cancer patients.
METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer were reviewed. Laparoscopic resections were matched 1:1 to open resections by age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and type of surgery. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact, chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Ninety-one rectal cancer patients with laparoscopic resection were included, 59% were male, and median age was 62 years. Conversion rate was 18.7%. Laparoscopic and open surgery had similar 30-day morbidity and mortality except wound infection, which was lower for the laparoscopic group (p = 0.02). Laparoscopic surgery had similar 30-day readmissions but shorter total length of hospital stay (5 versus 7 days, p < 0.01), time to first flatus (3 versus 4.5 days, p = 0.001), and time to first bowel movement (4 versus 5 days, p = 0.05) when compared with open surgery. The 3-year disease-free survival, local recurrence, and distant recurrence rates were also similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery can be safely performed for rectal cancer, with better postoperative recovery and acceptable early oncological outcomes. Results from large ongoing randomized trials with longer follow-up time are pending to better define oncologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585962     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1174-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Miyajima; Masaki Fukunaga; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Jun-ichi Tanaka; Junji Okuda; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of primary rectal cancer. Prospective randomised trial with standard operative and histopathological techniques. Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Group.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; E K Kranenbarg; W H Steup; C W Taat; H J Rutten; T Wiggers; J H van Krieken; J Hermans; J W Leer; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-05

5.  Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach.

Authors:  George Pechlivanides; Nikolaos Gouvas; John Tsiaoussis; Anastasios Tzortzinis; Maria Tzardi; M Moutafidis; Christos Dervenis; Evaghelos Xynos
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.404

6.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Milsom; Olival de Oliveira; Koiana I Trencheva; Sushil Pandey; Sang W Lee; Toyooki Sonoda
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takatoshi Nakamura; Hiroyuki Mitomi; Atsushi Ihara; Wataru Onozato; Takeo Sato; Heita Ozawa; Kazuhiko Hatade; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Current status of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Noam Shussman; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Mark H Hanna; Joseph C Carmichael; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on anastomotic leak after restorative resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pasha J Nisar; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: effects of conversion on long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Matteo Rottoli; Luca Stocchi; Dan P Geisler; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Case-matched comparison of the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Inada; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Taihei Oshiro; Masashi Takawa; Shin Fujita; Takayuki Akasu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies.

Authors:  Nobuaki Hoshino; Yudai Fukui; Koya Hida; Kazutaka Obama
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-11-21

7.  Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.

Authors:  T Matsuyama; H Endo; H Yamamoto; I Takemasa; K Uehara; T Hanai; H Miyata; T Kimura; H Hasegawa; Y Kakeji; M Inomata; Y Kitagawa; Y Kinugasa
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.