BACKGROUND: Residential proximity to road traffic is associated with increased coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality. It is unknown, however, whether changes in residential proximity to traffic could alter the risk of CHD mortality. METHODS: We used a population-based cohort study with a 5-year exposure period and a 4-year follow-up period to explore the association between changes in residential proximity to road traffic and the risk of CHD mortality. The cohort comprised all residents aged 45-85 years who resided in metropolitan Vancouver during the exposure period and without known CHD at baseline (n = 450,283). Residential proximity to traffic was estimated using a geographic information system. CHD deaths during the follow-up period were identified using provincial death registration database. The data were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with the subjects consistently living away from road traffic (>150 m from a highway or >50 m from a major road) during the 9-year study period, those consistently living close to traffic (<or=150 m from a highway or <or=50 m from a major road) had the greatest risk of CHD mortality (relative risk [RR] = 1.29 [95% confidence interval = 1.18-1.41]). By comparison, those who moved closer to traffic during the exposure period had less increased risk than those who were consistently exposed (1.20 [1.00-1.43]), and those who moved away from traffic had even less increase in the risk (1.14 [0.95-1.37]). All analyses were adjusted for baseline age, sex, pre-existing comorbidities (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease), and neighborhood socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Living close to major roadways was associated with increased risk of coronary mortality, whereas moving away from major roadways was associated with decreased risk.
BACKGROUND: Residential proximity to road traffic is associated with increased coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality. It is unknown, however, whether changes in residential proximity to traffic could alter the risk of CHD mortality. METHODS: We used a population-based cohort study with a 5-year exposure period and a 4-year follow-up period to explore the association between changes in residential proximity to road traffic and the risk of CHD mortality. The cohort comprised all residents aged 45-85 years who resided in metropolitan Vancouver during the exposure period and without known CHD at baseline (n = 450,283). Residential proximity to traffic was estimated using a geographic information system. CHD deaths during the follow-up period were identified using provincial death registration database. The data were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Compared with the subjects consistently living away from road traffic (>150 m from a highway or >50 m from a major road) during the 9-year study period, those consistently living close to traffic (<or=150 m from a highway or <or=50 m from a major road) had the greatest risk of CHD mortality (relative risk [RR] = 1.29 [95% confidence interval = 1.18-1.41]). By comparison, those who moved closer to traffic during the exposure period had less increased risk than those who were consistently exposed (1.20 [1.00-1.43]), and those who moved away from traffic had even less increase in the risk (1.14 [0.95-1.37]). All analyses were adjusted for baseline age, sex, pre-existing comorbidities (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart disease), and neighborhood socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Living close to major roadways was associated with increased risk of coronary mortality, whereas moving away from major roadways was associated with decreased risk.
Authors: Allison P Patton; Jessica Perkins; Wig Zamore; Jonathan I Levy; Doug Brugge; John L Durant Journal: Atmos Environ (1994) Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Samantha L Kingsley; Melissa N Eliot; Eric A Whitsel; Yen-Tsung Huang; Karl T Kelsey; Carmen J Marsit; Gregory A Wellenius Journal: Environ Int Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Doug Brugge; Ellin Reisner; Luz T Padró-Martínez; Wig Zamore; Emmanuel Owusu; John L Durant Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2013
Authors: Natasha DeJarnett; Ray Yeager; Daniel J Conklin; Jongmin Lee; Timothy E O'Toole; James McCracken; Wes Abplanalp; Sanjay Srivastava; Daniel W Riggs; Ihab Hamzeh; Stephen Wagner; Atul Chugh; Andrew DeFilippis; Tiffany Ciszewski; Brad Wyatt; Carrie Becher; Deirdre Higdon; Kenneth S Ramos; David J Tollerud; John A Myers; Shesh N Rai; Jasmit Shah; Nagma Zafar; Sathya S Krishnasamy; Sumanth D Prabhu; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Tarik Benmarhnia; Lynda Rey; Yuri Cartier; Christelle M Clary; Séverine Deguen; Astrid Brousselle Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Doug Brugge; Allison P Patton; Alex Bob; Ellin Reisner; Lydia Lowe; Oliver-John M Bright; John L Durant; Jim Newman; Wig Zamore Journal: Environ Justice Date: 2015-06-15
Authors: Kimberly B Glazer; Melissa N Eliot; Valery A Danilack; Lynn Carlson; Maureen G Phipps; Payam Dadvand; David A Savitz; Gregory A Wellenius Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Samantha L Kingsley; Melissa N Eliot; Eric A Whitsel; Yi Wang; Brent A Coull; Lifang Hou; Helene G Margolis; Karen L Margolis; Lina Mu; Wen-Chih C Wu; Karen C Johnson; Matthew A Allison; JoAnn E Manson; Charles B Eaton; Gregory A Wellenius Journal: Environ Res Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Christina H Fuller; Allison P Patton; Kevin Lane; M Barton Laws; Aaron Marden; Edna Carrasco; John Spengler; Mkaya Mwamburi; Wig Zamore; John L Durant; Doug Brugge Journal: Rev Environ Health Date: 2013 Impact factor: 3.458