Literature DB >> 20584476

Carotid artery stenting: experience of a single institute in china.

S M Li1, D Li, F Ling, Z R Miao, M L Wang.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Concern regarding the safety of Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) exists because of the risk of cerebral embolization during the procedure. The purpose of this article is to discuss that technology modification may improve the outcomes of this procedure. Between October 1997 and October 2004, 439 consecutive patients with 478 stenotic carotid arteries were treated. 284 vessels were stented without the use of embolic protection devices and 194 vessels with protection. Among cases not using protection device, 201 arteries were stented with predilation alone, 63 with postdilation alone, six with both pre- and post-dilation, two with neither and twelve were stented with balloon expandable stents. The technical success of 100%.The combined stroke and death rate during the procedure and the 30-day follow-up at 30 days was 1.67% overall. Three (0.63%) deaths occurred; one was due to a major infarction secondary to stent breakage, and two died of massive reperfusion intracerebral haemorrhage. There were total six ischemic stroke, of the five ischemic strokes wich developed in nonprotection group, two were among 201 cases with predilation alone (0.99%), which developed after stent deployment and postprocedure, and three among 63 cases with postdilation alone (4.76%), which developed immediately after postdilation. The incidence of ischemic stroke was lower among those who were stented with predilation alone than among those who were stented with postdilation alone. This likely results from reduced intimal injury and decreased risk of embolic complications.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 20584476      PMCID: PMC3404774          DOI: 10.1177/159101990501100302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of ruptures complicating angioplasty and stenting of supraaortic arteries: report of two cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  L Paul Broadbent; Christopher J Moran; DeWitte T Cross; Colin P Derdeyn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Editorial comment--Carotid artery stenting with or without protection devices? Strong opinions, poor evidence!

Authors:  Bernd Eckert; Hermann Zeumer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Results of a randomized controlled trial of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Mayo Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  D Inzitari; M Eliasziw; P Gates; B L Sharpe; R K Chan; H E Meldrum; H J Barnett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Alberto Cremonesi; Raffaella Manetti; Francesco Setacci; Carlo Setacci; Fausto Castriota
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  The natural history of asymptomatic moderate internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound.

Authors:  J W Olin; C Fonseca; M B Childs; M R Piedmonte; N R Hertzer; J R Young
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis defined by ultrasound and the risk of subsequent stroke in the elderly. The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  W T Longstreth; L Shemanski; D Lefkowitz; D H O'Leary; J F Polak; S K Wolfson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  R W Hobson; D G Weiss; W S Fields; J Goldstone; W S Moore; J B Towne; C B Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Carotid Stenting without Angioplasty and without Protection: The Advantages of a Less Invasive Procedure.

Authors:  M Leonardi; M Dall'olio; L Raffi; P Cenni; L Simonetti; R Marasco; F Giagnorio
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Demographic and Technical Risk Factors of 30-Day Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and/or Death in Standard- and High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Afshin Borhani Haghighi; Samaneh Yousefi; Ehsan Bahramali; Safoora Kokabi; Seyed Taghi Heydari; Abdolhamid Shariat; Alireza Nikseresht; Nahid Ashjazadeh; Sadegh Izadi; Peyman Petramfar; Maryam Poursadegh; Abbas Rahimi Jaberi; Sajjad Emami; Hamid Agheli; Reza Nemati; Ehsan Yaghoubi; Mohammad Hosein Abdi; Majid Panahandeh; Moslem Heydari; Anahid Safari; Marziyeh Basir; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Randal Edgell
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-07

Review 3.  Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  O Petr; W Brinjikji; M H Murad; B Glodny; G Lanzino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.